Photo of Dr. Price
Dr. Carl Price
Uncommon Elements

Sermon:
October 7th, 2007
Morning Services

Scripture:
1 Corinthians 11:23-26

The idea that the early church never had any problems or difficulties except for the Romans and the lions is rooted in nostalgia, not in fact. It is certainly not rooted in Paul’s letters! In fact, if Excedrin had been around in the first century, Paul could have written a new commercial for them. He could have called it The Corinthian Headache; it was substantial, and part of it had to do with what we now call Holy Communion. 

            I say “now call it” because they didn’t call it communion in those days. They called it The Lord’s Supper, and it seems to have been a fellowship meal, more like a potluck than a sip of juice and a tiny piece of bread. I say this because there seem to have been enough ingredients that Paul accused some of the participants of gluttony and drunkenness, and that would sure be hard to do on the portions we are serving! Listen to Paul in the section of the letter just before the passage I read a moment ago: 

When you come together, it is not the Lord’s Supper that you eat, for as you eat, each of you goes ahead without waiting for anybody else. One remains hungry while another gets drunk. 

That sounds like quite a time! More like chow time at a lumber camp than a service of worship! But it was in this context that Paul issued these strong words of caution about communion, words that have been so misunderstood that some will not take communion because they do not feel worthy to do so, mistakenly thinking that Paul was referring to “unworthy people” instead of an “unworthy manner.” 

Paul was not asking for perfection in the lives of those who shared in the Lord’s Supper. If it was on that basis, we wouldn’t bother to have it. Who could come? What Paul was asking for was a proper regard for what they were about. He was telling them not to treat what they were doing as a common meal and not to treat this cup as a common cup. 

But this was a Corinthian problem twenty centuries ago. What does it have to do with us? We do not come to communion with that kind of irreverence. Besides, we could not begin to get drunk on Welch’s grape juice! At least not when it was prepared within the last 24 hours. And you could eat a whole tray of the bread and it wouldn't amount to a medium pizza. Does what Paul wrote to the Corinthians mean anything in the twenty-first century, or is it just a bit of history that reminds us that divisions and unseemly behavior go back a ways? 

We do not have the usual time for the sermon this morning because the Sacrament itself is the primary message for today, but let me suggest that we can still use the reminder that this is no common loaf that we break, no common cup from which we drink. 

Over the years, the church has gone to great lengths to visualize the special nature of the chalice used for communion. For centuries there were stories of searches for the Holy Grail, referring to the cup that Jesus actually used at the meal in the upper room. Didn’t Indiana Jones once go looking for that? Some years ago, our denomination, in celebration of the 200th anniversary of Methodism in America, made a thousand replicas of a silver communion chalice owned by John Wesley. They sent one to each of the first thousand churches contributing $1,000 to a special fund to establish new churches. This church has one in the display case in the parlor, numbered 141. Vatican treasurers in Rome could show you chalices inlaid with gold and precious jewels.  Artists today tend to make them less ornate, more in keeping (they feel) with the character and spirit of the Christ, but still with observable efforts to make them something different than any other cup. The large white chalice on the altar this morning is made of Corinthian marble, and I cherish it because I had the privilege of using it to help serve communion to a large gathering in the great amphitheater in Ephesus, where the Apostle Paul preached and then got run out of town. Those of us who served that day were permitted to keep the chalice that we used. But this is not the kind of “uncommonness” I have in mind. 

I know that we sometimes use the phrase “common cup” to refer to the method of communion in which we use a single chalice for many people instead of the little glasses, and I am not trying to belittle the phrase in that context. But I would suggest that such availability to all is precisely what makes this cup uncommon! 

Where else is there such a breaking down of barriers at a table? In most special meals, the guests are carefully chosen and many others would never expect an invitation. This is true at either end and all along the social scale. Even our churches often reflect something of the social strata of a community on a typical Sunday morning. But at the table of the Lord, such barriers are broken down and no one is kept away because of class or color or ability or status in life. At least that is our United Methodist tradition, and it has been true at any church at which I have ever been a pastor. This is a very uncommon cup from which we drink. 

A few years ago, Andrew Wolfe, a United Methodist pastor from Alabama, wrote about his experience of communion while on a trip to Eastern Europe. This was in 1967, forty years ago,  long before the more open borders of today. While his group was there, they visited a church in Moscow. They were late in arriving and the service had started. The building was filled to overflowing; people were standing in the aisles and on the stairways. But it was known that they  were coming and seats had been reserved for their group in the balcony. 

They sat there, he said, not understanding a word of the service, but understanding very well the expressions on the faces of the people as the hymns were sung. And they understood when the bread was brought in, along with great chalices of wine, that they were to celebrate the Lord’s Supper. Bread was taken and blessed, broken and passed into the congregation. Let me tell the story in his words: 

As the elements made their way around....people would reach out for the elements with what could only be described as thankful hearts.

 

It came our turn to receive. We stood, but somehow the bread passed me by without my getting any. I simply waited for the chalice. But as I stood there, there was a tap on my shoulder. I turned around to look into the face of an ancient Russian woman, her head tied in a kerchief, wrinkles covering every inch of her face, but with eyes that sparkled. And then she did something that I shall remember for as long as I live. She tore her bread in half and handed it to me. She wanted to make sure that I shared fully in the banquet of Christ.

 

We did not speak the same language, she and I. We were generations apart; from two nations separated by politics, by economics, by ideology, broken in nearly every way a human family can be broken. And yet none of that mattered in that moment of reconciliation and oneness. We were brother and sister in Christ, and that mattered more than all the world’s dividing lines.

(Pulpit Digest, Oct.-Nov. 1984, p. 5-6) 

There is nothing common about a loaf  like that. And as you receive the elements this morning, I invite you to think of others sharing this Lord’s Supper with you—not only in this sanctuary, but around the world—as the voices in our call to worship and the prayer and the hymn tried to remind us. 

As you take the bread, I invite you to think of persons about whom you care very much—some who may be sitting with you, some separated by miles, some even separated by death. Recognize that this is a very uncommon loaf that you break, and know that you eat with them. 

But it gets more uncommon than that. That Christian lady in Russia did a beautiful thing, but she was, after all, a stranger. And we share this table not only with strangers, but symbolically, and sometimes literally, with people we know quite well. And that sometimes means people we dislike as well as those we like. Those folk are invited to this table, too.

So when it is time to lift those tiny cups, I invite you to think of any with whom you have had difficulty getting along, whether at work or at home or at school. Again, remember that this is no common cup that you hold. You are sharing in the remembrance that Christ’s blood was shed for all, even those we may have trouble liking very much. “For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.” (I Corinthians 11:26) 

There is nothing common about this cup, about this loaf.  

Thanks be to God. Amen.


The Cross and Flame is a registered trademark of The United Methodist Church.®
Copyright 1998-2008. First United Methodist Church.
1589 West Maple Road, Birmingham, Michigan 48009 U.S.A.
248-646-1200.

Map and Contact Information

Contact Us | Calendar of Events | Sermon Archive | Announcements | Steeple Notes (newsletter) | Mission and Outreach | Music | Prayer and Healing | Christian Education | Christian Life Center | Adults | Youth | Children and Families | About Us | Virtual Bookstore | Online Donations | Monday Memo |