Photo of Dr. Price
Dr. Carl Price
The Need for Negatives

Sermon:
August 26, 2006
Morning Services

Scripture:
Exodus 20:1-17

Pat once gave me a cartoon that showed a man one would assume to be Moses, since he was standing on a mountaintop with two stone tablets. He was looking up at the sky and saying, “Of course, you realize it will need to be voted on by the membership.” 

We do not like to be told what we cannot do. You have noticed that, haven’t you? Has anyone ever got paint on your finger after reading a sign that said, “Wet Paint: Do Not Touch”? I rest my case. 

Some time ago, Reader’s Digest carried a story about a couple touring a large, restored mansion in Florida. In the exquisitely furnished master bedroom, they were surprised to see signs on the bedspread and curtains reading, “WASH HANDS IMMEDIATELY AFTER TOUCHING.” They admired the furnishings from a safe distance, but on leaving, they decided to ask the guard if the fabric had been treated with some harmful preserving chemical.   

The guard replied, “Oh, no, ma’am. There’s nothing on ’em. We just never did have much luck with the ‘Do Not Touch’ signs.” Neither has God.   

It is the “Do Not” that gets us, isn’t it? That is the way it all started, remember? Adam and Eve in the Garden with all that fruit to eat and one tree they were told to leave alone. And which one did they head for? 

I grant you that negatives can get ridiculous, and even ludicrous at times. In Bible study classes we sometimes look at the extremes that things had come to in Jesus’ day, but we don’t have to go there. We can give them a run for the money. Every now and then you can find a list of the negatives that some legislature has felt they needed to vote into place. How about these examples:

  • In New York City, you are not allowed to open an umbrella in front of a horse. (Actually, that one probably makes a great deal of sense to the riders of  the horses.)

  • In Natome, Kansas, it is illegal to practice knife throwing at someone wearing a striped suit. (Don’t ask!)

  • In the Pine Island District of Minnesota, a man must tip his hat when passing a cow. (The dairy lobby has obviously been busy there.)

  • There is a Michigan law that prohibits hitching a crocodile to a fire hydrant. (It must be all those people coming back from Florida.).

  • When we were in Fairbanks, Alaska, we heard of a law that said it was illegal for a moose to walk on the sidewalk.

With a bit of research, one could go on like this for a long time. With a bit of research you can trace most of  those negatives back to reasoning that, to use an expression I have found a great deal of use for:  “It seemed like a good idea at the time.”  

As contradictory as it may sound, I would suggest that there is a connection between our profusion of laws and our dislike of them. Would you consider that the root of our problem lies in our resistance to the rules for living that were given on Sinai; that is, because we have resisted those basic guidelines for life, we have had to resort to the multiplicity of legalisms to save us from each other and from ourselves. 

Let me be clear that I affirm that you cannot live the Christian life on the basis of what you  don’t do. Christian living is very much about doing—doing the right thing. But I invite you to consider that the Commandments were not given as restrictive rules dreamed up by a God who simply wanted to complicate our lives or have something for which to blame us. So, you say, if we need a list, why not just a list of things to do? Jesus did offer that as a summary, after all: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and mind and strength, and your neighbor as yourself.” Aside from the fact that humanity has no better record on observing that summary than it does on the longer version, some things just seem to need the negative to communicate properly. Think about it. 

One of the exercises that we have tried in Disciple classes over the years has been to rewrite the Ten Commandments in positive form. Some of them seem to come out reasonably well, but for the most part, for some reason, it seems to weaken them. Try it for yourself. They seem to lose  something of their imperative.  

One day when I was serving in the Marine Corps in Korea, we were moving along a narrow road toward some distant mountains. Suddenly there was an explosion near the front of the column. There had been no scream of artillery shell, no flutter of an incoming mortar fire. Some Marines started to get off the road and take cover when a second explosion went off. On the heels of that one, someone shouted, “Mine field! Don’t anyone move! Don’t leave the path!” 

We had a new, rather green lieutenant leading the column that day who evidently didn’t do very well in his map reading class. At the trail junction a little ways back, we had turned left. We evidently should have turned right.  

The orders that came to us during those next few moments were almost entirely negative. “Don’t leave the path!” “Don’t step on or sit on or pick up any rocks!” “Don’t touch anything on the side of the road.” Negatives. But the impact of those negative orders in the lives of that company of Marines was very positive! We made it out without any other casualties. 

That is the spirit in which we need to hear these words that came to Moses on the mountain. They are rules that are meant for our health and well being; they are not just a list of things not to do, given to annoy us or cause us inconvenience. They were, and they are, words of life. Ignore them and we risk disaster. 

During the investigation that followed the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger, an engineer at Morton Thiokol testified that he advised his superiors that weather conditions at Cape Kennedy were too cold to guarantee the safety of the spacecraft’s O-ring sealants. He told them they should not proceed with the launch. Management pressed for more specifics. How cold was too cold? Forty degrees? Thirty-seven degrees? Could they launch at forty-one degrees? The engineer resisted pinning down an exact temperature that was dangerous. He said that he couldn’t be that precise because he hadn’t run those kind of tests. 

The man used an interesting expression to try to tell them his concerns. All he could tell them, he said, was that the weather predicted for launching time was “away from goodness.” He said that what he knew about the O-rings and the proposed launch during cold weather didn’t “fit.” But because he couldn’t describe this lack of fit any better than it being “away from goodness,” his warnings went unheeded. (Robert H. Waterman, Jr., The Renewal Factor, New York: Bantam Books, 1987, p. 50, reported in Seven World Publications

The negatives in the commandments are a bit like that. They may not spell out all the problems or give details of all the consequences, but they warn us about a path that leads “away from goodness.” Disaster comes because the paths those “Noes” warn us about lead to danger. We need these warnings the same way children need to learn not to run into the street, not to play with fire, not to swim in the ocean when the rip tides are running. 

You can go down the line with this list of negatives and verify that. In his book To My People With Love, John Killinger tells the story of a man who was the president of a bank, a leader in his community and active in his church. But he ignored this law about covetousness and stealing. Dr. Killinger writes, 

He wanted a big house and a swimming pool. (For his family, no doubt.) He wanted fancy cars for his children to drive. He began embezzling funds from his bank. He took only a little at first, for it seemed a fearful thing to do. But then, when nobody noticed, he began taking more and more.

 

When his wife asked him, “Honey, can we afford such and such?” He would say, “Yes, go ahead and get it.” And he took more money to cover the cost. 

Nine years later, his kingdom came apart. An investigation was launched, he was tried and convicted and went to prison. His family lost their home, his children lost their cars. Their whole world fell apart. In prison he found the God whose law he had broken. Dr. Killinger says that he now gives talks to young people about the dangers of working on their dreams at the expense of ignoring the warnings found in the laws of God. (John Killinger, To My People With Love, p. 27-28)  

You don’t have to read too many newspaper headlines to find other examples of the same lessons. Many of the commandments are stated in the negative, but obeying them yields positive results.       

A few years ago there was a television series entitled Touched By An Angel. The story line varied  from week to week, but the recurring theme was the work of a small group of angels trying to communicate God’s care and save people, usually from themselves. One of the episodes dealt with one of these “emotional triangles” that TV is fond of—a man, his wife and his mistress. But in this story, instead of fixating on steamy bedroom scenes with people jumping in and out of bed, it dealt with the wrongness of what was going on.  

The mistress in the drama does not consider herself an evil woman. She has one especially good line. At one point, says she knew the man had a wife, but she didn’t know that he was married. Now there is a fine distinction for you! The angel brings them all together in one place, and in the dialogue, the unfaithful man says that he is struggling with that “male syndrome, death complex.” That is a rephrasing of “mid-life crisis.” 

Tess, the angel played by Della Reese, responds, “That’s what you call it? Well, get over it!” And then she tells him, “You will recognize infidelity.” I guess you could call that putting it in the affirmative. 

There is a place for negatives. Discipline by distraction is not always enough. There comes a time when you simply need to tell the three year old not to put kitty in the potty and not just show him (or her) a new tricycle or a new dolly. The tricycle or the dolly may not always be handy; and that approach has a way of growing into larger and more elaborate distractions that can end up causing more problems than they cure. 

We have already noted that the earliest story in the Bible involved a Divine “No!” laid upon the man and woman in the garden. I realize that it is tempting to debunk this story because it does not seem to fit with evolutionary theories. But friends, the early stories in the Bible are not so much about science and time lines as they are about human beings and their relationship to God and one another. And a great number of those stories point to the consequences of doing things that we ought not do. 

Understand that the point of this sermon is not to beat on us for all the things we do that we shouldn’t. I have no desire to tie us up in some new or ancient legalism and make our salvation dependent on how measurably and minutely we keep the law. We have been down that road before and secular society walks it every day. Jesus Christ delivers us from that kind of struggle and God offers us forgiveness. But even the forgiven life has to be lived in this world, and the point of this sermon is to remind us that the negatives that God has given help us to do that. They are not a list of things to avoid because they make God angry. They are for our good. They are like the calls to that column of Marines on that path in Korea. 

Remember that Outback Steakhouse sign I referred to in Steeple Notes that started this line of  thinking? “No Rules. Just Right.” At one point I found myself wondering if it was the food or the slogan that attracted some of the cars. I thought that was probably just my preaching genes working overtime. Then, on Friday, I got an email from Roger and Barbara Timm. They had read the Steeple Notes article and did a bit of a search on my behalf. They sent me a link to an article in the St. Petersburg Times last September. It was an interview with Nancy Schneid, whom the reporter called “one of the chief branding officers” of the restaurant chain. It seems that the slogan originally came from a Tampa ad agency, but in reflecting on the slogan, Ms. Schneid said:  

“No rules, just right” meant you could have anything any way you liked it, and we would take care of you. As time evolved, it also meant you could dress any way you like... “No rules” not only became an external marketing message but an internal cry, the very core of our culture, which is that there are no rules to making a customer happy. 

Well, maybe it wasn’t just those sermon genes after all. It sounds so…so…positive. Understand, this is not intended as a criticism of the slogan for the restaurant, for food or dress code. “No rules, just right” may be fine. But when that becomes an approach to life, it has a way of getting interpreted as what is “right” for me. We see the results in the surveys that report the numbers that see no harm in cheating on exams; in the work ethic (or lack thereof) in the market place; in the lawsuits that seem to be focused more on the depth of the pockets than the responsibility for the action; in the drivers that go roaring past you while you are sitting in line for the merging traffic, expecting that someone up ahead will let them back in.   

I say again that I recognize that we cannot live the Christian life simply on the basis of what we don’t do. And I agree that we need to live life in the positive. But sometimes it needs to be a positive that grows out of recognizing the right negatives.   

A few weeks ago, I was on an errand with three of our grandsons. Exercising a grandfather’s prerogative in the absence of parents, I asked if on our way back they would like to stop some place for ice cream. I had two immediate agreements from Mike and Chris, the twelve-year-old twins, and a qualified yes from seven-year-old Benjamin. Ben said, “I can eat non-dairy ice cream.” Ben has a serious allergy to dairy projects and I had forgotten that for a moment. Not a problem; we knew a place that had a non-dairy alternative. And in fact, we ended up with four non-dairy cones and they were really good.  

I thought Ben had a wonderful way of expressing his situation in a positive manner. Not “I can’t eat ice cream” but  “I can eat non-dairy ice cream.” But Ben’s learning to accentuate the positive was rooted in the reality of his need to recognize a negative. When I commented on the experience to his parents, his dad said, “Three late night trips to the emergency ward can be a good teacher.” 

Think of the Commandments as a teacher. In fact, that is what the Apostle Paul called them. In his letter to the Galatians, he wrote, “The law was our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ” (Galatians 3:24). 

Think of the commandments like that, and we discover that non-dairy ice cream is not the only pretty good stuff. Think of them as a map through a minefield. And because we know where not to walk, we can discover the joys in where we are to walk. 

Thanks be to God. Amen.


 


The Cross and Flame is a registered trademark of The United Methodist Church.®
Copyright 1998-2008. First United Methodist Church.
1589 West Maple Road, Birmingham, Michigan 48009 U.S.A.
248-646-1200.

Map and Contact Information

Contact Us | Calendar of Events | Sermon Archive | Announcements | Steeple Notes (newsletter) | Mission and Outreach | Music | Prayer and Healing | Christian Education | Christian Life Center | Adults | Youth | Children and Families | About Us | Virtual Bookstore | Online Donations | Monday Memo |