|
Back in
my novel-reading days ... to which I will probably not return
until I glide (or somebody pushes me) into retirement ...
I kept company with an author named John O'Hara, who wrote
about the "social set" living in the mythical town
of Gibbsville, Pennsylvania. Critics have suggested that O'Hara's
signature novel was one of his earliest. Oddly enough, it
begins with a 14-line quote from W. Somerset Maugham. Listen:
There
was a merchant in Baghdad who sent his servant to market
to buy provisions. In a little while the servant came back,
white and trembling, and said: "Master, just now when
I was in the marketplace, I was jostled by a woman in the
crowd. When I turned, I saw that it was Death that jostled
me. She looked at me and made a threatening gesture. So
lend me your horse and I will ride from this city and avoid
my fate. I will go to Samarra. Death will not find me there."
The
merchant lent him his horse, whereupon the servant mounted
it and dug his spurs in its flanks. As fast as the horse
could gallop, he went. Then the merchant went down to the
marketplace and saw the woman standing in the crowd ...
the same woman who had frightened his servant. Approaching
her, the merchant said: "Why did you make a threatening
gesture to my servant when you saw him earlier this morning?"
"That was not a threatening gesture," she answered,
"it was only a start of surprise. I was astonished
to see him in Baghdad, for I have an appointment with him
tonight in Samarra."
The woman
(of course) is Death ... with the assumption being that you
cannot avoid or outrun her if she has decided that the hour
of your appointed rendezvous is now.
This idea
(that "Death is a stalker who refuses to be denied")
seems to fascinate everybody. But it especially fascinates
teenagers who pay good money to see Death do her thing (his
thing, somebody's thing) in horror films galore. Where teenagers
are concerned, the bloodier, the better. One such film, Final
Destination, opened Friday (although I haven't seen it
and have no plans to). The headline in the local review read:
"Teen Gorefest Takes a Predictable Path."
As for
the plot, it concerns a high school French class and two adult
teachers who board a plane for Paris ... and a field trip
to die for (pun, clearly intended). Just before buckling in,
one of the students has a premonition of the plane exploding,
moments after take-off. In a panic, he blurts out his grisly
vision. All of which leads to a fistfight and his expulsion
from the aircraft. This is followed by the voluntary decision
of a few others ... and one teacher ... to similarly deplane.
Sure enough, the plane takes off and the plane blows up ...
killing the second teacher, the remainder of the class, and
everyone else who just happened to be on board.
But that's
only the beginning. One by one, the lucky ones (those who
got off the plane in the nick of time) die too ... in a very
specific order. What is the message? That Death will not be
cheated out of his victims (notice, here, that Death is identified
with masculine pronouns rather than feminine ones). To reveal
any more will spoil your fun ... should you go. Which I recommend
you don't. And chances are good that you'll never see this
film as an in-flight movie selection. But your kids and grandkids
will take it in, and may even echo the sentiments of one of
its stars, who said: "Sure, you can't take this too seriously.
But it's a fun ride. Plus, it's got the best deaths of any
movie I've seen. That, and it's scary." Lord, save us.
This is
certainly not a new idea. If memory serves me correctly, Emily
Dickinson once pictured Death as keeping its appointments
by carriage. Which, as an idea, is certainly more refined.
And which bears some relationship to "the chariot"
(and its accompanying "band of angels") that some
would sing is "coming for to carry me home."
Images?
Of course they're images. Are they meant to be taken literally?
I doubt it. Are they meant to be taken seriously? I'd suggest
it.
There's
a line of progression in all of this, is there not? Death
calls. Death comes. Death collects. Death carries. But does
Death stalk? And is there a time ... prescheduled ... for
Death to appear? I think not. But there are many who do not
agree with me. Including my maternal grandmother who, as I
am sure you know, was once a major force in my life. Since
she lived to 97 ... I almost said "the ripe old age of
97," but the last few of those years were anything but
"ripe" ... you could hardly say that my grandmother
was cheated out of her innings.
But a
couple of years prior to her death, she was absolutely convinced
her time had come. She was in the hospital. I can't recall
the reason. There didn't seem to be the usual signs that Death's
door was open ... or even slightly ajar. But she thought it
was. So she told all of us in the room she loved us ... was
proud of us ... wished the best for us ... and said "good-bye"
to each of us (by name, no less). Then she folded her hands
on her chest and quietly closed her eyes. Which was lovely.
And touching. But somewhat premature.
After
about 30 seconds, she opened her eyes and seemed genuinely
surprised that she was still looking at all the same faces
standing in the same places. So she went through the same
speech again ... said the same "good-byes" again
... folded the same hands again ... closed the same eyes again
... leading to the same results again. Meaning that she didn't
die. For a couple more years. Which led her to conclude that
the "Man Upstairs" (her term, not mine) either wasn't
ready for her, or didn't want her. Whereupon she would ask
me to ask Him (meaning the "Man Upstairs") what
was going on.
My grandmother
was not overly religious. But she was convinced that death
came by pre-appointment. And she was further convinced that
somehow ... through some heavenly screw-up ... she had missed
hers.
I have
heard smokers tell me that they feel no need to quit, because
"when your number is called, it won't matter whether
you have spent your life sucking on pure oxygen or sucking
on Pall Malls."
I have
heard skydivers say: "Not to worry" in discussing
their risky business, given their contention that "when
your time comes, it won't matter whether you are falling through
the clouds or snoozing on the sofa, you're history."
And "until your time comes," you haven't got a reason
in the world to worry.
I have
heard soldiers speculate that the difference between coming
home to a victory parade or coming home to a funeral procession
is a simple matter of whether there is a "bullet out
there with your name on it."
When Bobby
Phills, star guard of the Charlotte Hornets, was pulled dead
from the wreckage of his roadster, a few short weeks ago,
one of his teammates said (in a eulogy, no less), "that
God called Bobby home early" ... somewhat overlooking
the fact that Bobby was driving his roadster in excess of
100 miles per hour when God's call came. Sometimes it amazes
me when I hear the things God gets credited with ... or blamed
for.
Are our
days numbered? Most assuredly. "We are born to die,"
the Bible says. We are "like grass" ... which has
its day in the sun (or its season in the sun). Then, as is
the case with grass, either time withers us or life mows us.
Whereupon life (at least as we know it here) goes on without
us.
Early
on, the Bible talks (allegorically, methinks) about a few
people who celebrated an incredible number of birthdays. I
mean, where did they find birthday cards that read: "Congratulations
on your 600th?" But with the passing of years, the Bible
pretty much settled in on "three score and ten"
(meaning 70) or "four score" (meaning 80) as a normative
number for the human life span. Still, it bothered biblical
writers that there were some who died prematurely ... meaning
early ... and they didn't quite know what to make of it. After
all, what is the Book of Job, if not a speculative discourse
on the question of why some things do not seem fair ... or
just ... or right?
Clearly,
the Bible wrestles with the idea (I almost said "plays
with the idea," except that it sounds too frivolous ...
and Lent is certainly not a time to be frivolous) that when
the curtain comes down, God's hands can be generally found
on the pulleys. Which is what we have in today's little story
about the near death ... followed by the 15-year reprieve
... of King Hezekiah. His story is really old. It dates from
between 705-701 B.C. (making it 2700 years old).
God tells
Isaiah (the prophet) to tell Hezekiah (the king): "Get
your house in order. For you shall not recover." Whereupon
Hezekiah weeps and prays, telling God that he has always "talked
the talk and walked the walk" where belief in God is
concerned. Which apparently cuts the mustard with God. So
God intercepts Isaiah (who has not quite reached the middle
court of his exit from the palace) and says: "Halt. Go
back. Retrace your steps. Reverse your message. Tell Hezekiah
I have heard his prayers ... I have seen his tears ... and
he's right. He deserves more time. So I'll add fifteen years."
Which
is exactly what happens. Isaiah turns around and tells the
king the good news. He also heals Hezekiah's boil with a "figgy
poultice" (we must be talking "virulent infection"
here). Then Isaiah adds: "The sign that you have been
reprieved will be the shadow's retreat on the sundial by 10
intervals." Whereupon Isaiah cries to God and the shadow
retreats 10 intervals on the sundial. Message sent. Message
authenticated.
It's a
fascinating story. But why did I choose it for today's text?
Because, on one hand, it suggests the notion of a predetermined
date with Death ... as in "now" ... or "fifteen
years from now." But it also suggests (as early as 700
B.C.) that nothing is set in concrete ... that everything
is negotiable (or amendable) ... and that while God has appointed
for each of us to die, the circumstances of our dying (including
the timing of our dying) may also have something to do with
us. Indeed, quite a bit to do with us.
When Jesus
says to the rich fool (the guy with so much "stuff"
he can't find sufficient barn storage in which to keep it)
that "this very night your soul is being demanded of
you ... and what will become of all this stuff then,"
I don't think Jesus is so much predicting, as he is preaching.
And when Jesus says, concerning himself, "that the Son
of Man must suffer and die," I am one of those who believe
that the real temptation of Jesus (indeed, the last temptation
of Jesus) is that he could have slipped from supper ... slipped
from Jerusalem ... slipped quietly back to Galilee ... become
a fair-to-middling country preacher ... retired at 65 ...
wintered at the Red Sea resort ... and died of congestive
heart failure in his bed ... had he chosen to exercise his
will at the expense of his Father's.
In short,
I believe there is some "play" in the system, and
that death neither stalks us, nor consults a fore-ordained
appointment calendar as to when it should visit us. As concerns
the listing of my name, I do not think there is a number beside
it. And as concerns the listing of yours, I do not think there
is a number beside it, either. As to the possibility that
"angels of death" may come (and I'm extremely comfortable
with the idea that they do ... quite apart from the television
series), I think they come to take us home, not to do us in.
Does God
know (in advance) that death is near? Darned if I know. I
suppose it depends on what you mean by the word "advance."
I doubt that God knew "in advance" that Bobby Phills
was going to die in that fatal car wreck in Charlotte ...
although I suppose a certain predictability of tragedy can
be attached to behaviors such as driving 105 miles per hour
on the city streets of Charlotte, rather than on the oval
track at Darlington. So God "could have known" ...
just as many of us could have known. It's relatively easy
to be prophetic when the people you are prophesying about
are stupid.
As concerns
the premonitions of death that come to some from time to time,
I simply do not know what to make of them. I hear the same
stories you do ... stories about people who never had a sick
day in their lives (and haven't seen a doctor in years) who
suddenly, with no apparent explanation, start putting their
affairs in order. All the while, they deny they are doing
so. But then they die. And everybody says: "They must
have sensed something."
Did God
send them a message? Or were they unconsciously listening
to their own body language and intuiting self-sent signs of
their own mortality? Darned if I know. But if you forced me
to take a position, I'd lean toward the latter rather than
the former.
Now I
know ... I just know ... that some of you are going to hit
me at the door with the doctrine of predestination ... or
the idea that all things are pre-determined by God, to the
point of being pre-scripted by God. We'll have to talk about
that someday, you and I. Suffice it to say, for now, that
I don't embrace it. And there are relatively few Methodists
who do.
Prior
to St. Augustine (354-430 A.D.), the early church never preached
this. And when it does appear in theology, it is never in
the context of who dies or who lives, but who is saved and
who is not. At issue in the doctrine of predestination is
not whether our daily comings and goings have been pre-planned,
but whether our salvation has been pre-assured. Unfortunately,
the doctrine has been perverted to say things it never intended
to say. Which is probably why Augustine said it should never
be preached in the hearing of common folk. So much for my
"history of doctrine" lecture.
*
* * * *
One final
word! From time, immemorial, preachers have seized upon the
unpredictability of death's timetable as a way of warning
the faithful and the unfaithful to "clean up their act."
"You never know," the preacher thunders, "it
could happen any day ... any time ... any place ... to any
one of you" (funny, I never hear them say "to any
one of us"). Still, it's a legitimate sermon topic, given
that John the Baptist made a career out of it. Even Jesus
preached it from time to time ("Fool, what if all the
chips get cashed ... the IOUs get called ... the chickens
come home to roost ... this very night?").
But I
am among those who feel that if obedience to the gospel is
beneficial to the next life, it must be beneficial to this
one. Why obey? Because it's a better way to live ... a happier
way to live ... a healthier way to live. The Bible is clear.
There is no way of living that will deny death. But there
are some ways of living that may delay it ("may,"
not "will" ... there are no guarantees). But which
leads me to say that the best reason for cleaning up your
act ... the best reason for getting religion ... the best
reason for turning to God ... the best reason for coming home
to Jesus ... is not in case you die. But in case you don't.
Note:
The narrative concerning Hezekiah and Isaiah can also be found
in the first 22 verses of Isaiah 38. I chose to read it from
II Kings, given that the flow of the narrative is tighter
and more sequentially organized in II Kings. Most scholars
suggest that Isaiah's version has certain key elements misplaced.
However, Isaiah's version also includes Hezekiah's "psalm
of gratitude," alleged to have been uttered in response
to the 15-year reprieve. The "psalm" is a lovely
piece of writing, but probably existed, quite apart from Hezekiah's
voicing it, as a psalm popular in the liturgy of the Temple.
The quote
from Somerset Maugham is taken from the opening page of John
O'Hara's highly-acclaimed novel, Appointment in Samarra.
|