|
There
are endless variations on the old story about the revival
preacher, out making his rounds, who happened upon a farmer
abusing his mule with a shovel. Apparently, the mule wouldn't
go ... or wouldn't go right. So the farmer got out of the
wagon, grabbed his spade, and gave the mule a couple of blows
upside the head. Leading the preacher to admonish the farmer
(albeit in tones slathered in the syrup of humble piety) that
the mule was one of God's creatures, too ... and that he would
surely proceed as directed, if addressed with words befitting
a Christian. To which the farmer replied: "Well preacher,
that's what I'm afixin' to do ... once I get his attention."
Which
is mildly humorous until you have met someone who has beaten
a kid ... or a spouse ... as a means of getting their attention.
"Gee, Reverend (Gee, Your Honor), I wouldn't have done
what I did if my kid hadn't ignored me, or if my spouse would
have shut up and listened to me. I mean, I shouldn't have
hit `em. But sometimes there's no other way of getting through
to `em."
I've heard
that. I've probably come this close to saying it, once or
twice. But I still can't believe it whenever I hear it. Yeah,
it's hard to get "mulish personalities" to pay attention.
But my higher nature recoils at the thought of God's "chillun"
... be they two legged or four legged ... being hit with the
flat side of a shovel or the closed side of a fist, just so
they'll "listen up" as a prelude to "goin'
right."
Hold that
thought for a minute while I invite you to ponder Harold Stanton
(who we recently honored as our 1999 "Volunteer of the
Year"). Time would fail me, were I to tell you Harold's
wonderful story. What interests me today are not the things
that Harold (in his own quiet way) makes happen, but something
that (in a most unquiet way) happened to him. I am talking
about Harold's accident last October 14, which took place
at the Habitat House work site where Harold was volunteering
... again. And where an entire square of shingles came down
from above, just as Harold was walking below. The falling
shingles got him good (upside the head) ... driving him to
his knees ... breaking his leg ... dislodging his back ...
blacking his eye ... paining his cranium ... and leaving him
with equilibrium issues that have not completely subsided,
even to this day.
Well,
everybody's heart went out to Harold ... hands went out to
Harold ... cards went out to Harold ... even as prayers went
up for Harold. Rendering Harold grateful. Profoundly grateful.
But when Harold saw the topic of my sermon this morning (especially
the subtitle: "Middle of the Night Musings on the Suggestion
that `God Never Gives Us More Than We Can Handle'"),
Harold sent me an e-mail recalling comments that were made
to him during his seemingly interminable period of incapacitation.
Included among them were a couple he found interesting. Not
alarming, just interesting. So he passed them along and said:
"Make of them what you will." And a subsequent phone
call gave me explicit permission to do just that. Those comments
included:
Harold,
this is God's way of telling you to slow down.
Harold,
this is a wake up call from God, suggesting there is some
new work God has for you to do.
I don't
know who said those things to Harold. And if Harold remembers,
he certainly didn't tell me. And probably didn't mind. What's
more, I am sure they were said in love. Somebody wanted to
put a "religious spin" on a terrible tragedy, so
as to bring a level of meaning and purpose to Harold's accident
that might not have been discernible otherwise. Hearing such
comments, Harold might feel: "Ah, somebody thinks I'm
important to God ... that I matter to God ... and that God
will stop at nothing to have his word heard by me, and his
will done through me." Which, I am sure, is how the comments
were meant.
But they
also led Harold to ponder: "Gee, am I that dense that
the only way God could get me to slow down (or wake up) was
to drop a square of shingles on my head ... or (at least)
orchestrate a scenario by which somebody else dropped a square
of shingles on my head? If so, what does that say about me?
And, if so, what does that say about God? Is it occasionally
necessary for God to stop one step short of killing us, so
that God can ultimately have his way with us?"
Those
are hard questions. Don't dismiss them lightly. Those are
the kind of questions that keep theological libraries full,
theological faculties employed, and theologians (masquerading
as preachers) awake at 3:00 in the morning.
To be
sure, maybe Harold needed to slow down. Or maybe Harold needed
to wake up. And maybe God does (indeed) have some marvelous
new assignment planned for Harold ... once he slows down or
wakes up. And, to be sure, the "shingle mugging"
... from wherever it came ... didn't kill Harold. And may,
in some way that a mere mortal like me can't comprehend, have
been instrumental in saving Harold ... or in saving the world
through Harold. But there persists the thought that if I hit
my mule (my wife, my kid) upside the head as a prelude to
getting through to them ... saving them ... or even saving
the world through them ... most of you would look at me funny,
some of you would think me screwy, and more than a few of
you would judge me harshly.
Now, before
moving on, let me say three things ... just to get them on
the record.
First,
God's ways are not my ways ... not limited to my ways ...
and not to be evaluated by the degree to which they conform
to my ways. I am not properly positioned to sit in judgment
of God. Or to explain God. My ministry got a whole lot easier
on the day that I finally figured that out. Concerning the
mysteries of omnipotence, I do the best I can with the limited
tools I have. I have finally come to terms with the fact
that I, too, see "as in a mirror dimly" ... meaning
that I sometimes have just enough knowledge to be dangerous,
while lacking enough knowledge to be useful.
Second,
having said that, I am often puzzled by people who are clearer
than I am as to what God may be saying ... what God may
be doing ... and precisely why it is that God may be saying
and doing it. How, for example, can anyone discern the mind
of God as to whether Harold should slow down or wake up?
Third,
I believe that there is no circumstance that God cannot
use ... quite apart from the question of whether God originates
that circumstance ... to accomplish his will. I have no
doubt that Harold will say (when you ask him) that "God
has worked through my accident." But I have lots of
doubt that Harold will say (when you ask him) that "God
caused my accident" ... or even that it happened according
to God's plan.
But let's
push on. Leave Harold for a moment. Direct your attention
to a young man in the church parking lot who, not long ago,
said to me: "Bill, you know that there are some struggles
in my life. And you know how hard I am trying to stay on top
of the struggles in my life. So far, I'm making it. But, just
the other day, somebody sent me a card that contained the
words, `Remember, God never gives us more than we can handle.'
Bill, do you believe that?"
Alright.
All of you who have a hankering to be preachers, go home and
record a two paragraph response to that young man. I almost
said: "Go home and write a two paragraph answer to that
question." But, if there is any difference between a
preacher and a theologian, it begins with the fact that preachers
have to deliver their responses out loud ... in person ...
to young men in parking lots. Theologians, however, can retire
to libraries where they can ponder their answers and, eventually,
publish them in journals. So here's what I said on that day....to
that man ... in that lot ... on "whether God ever gives
us more than we can handle."
First
off, I said that he shouldn't be overly analytical of things
that people say at those moments in life when (by their own
admission) people don't have the faintest idea what to say.
Just listen to the fact that they have tried to say something
... and that they cared enough to say something. The sender
of that card was probably trying to say: "Friend, I have
heard ... I care ... I feel for you ... I have every confidence
that this will not defeat you ... and that God will somehow
be part of the equation ensuring that this will not defeat
you. You are down. But I am persuaded that you will not be
out."
That's
what the sender wanted to say. Unfortunately, that's not what
the words on the card said. They said that "God will
not give you more than you will be able to handle." You
will note that my emphasis is on the words "God will
not give you," rather than on the words "more than
you will be able to handle."
Let us
assume, for the moment, that God has (indeed) given that young
man the problems he is trying to handle. Let us assume that,
as problems go, God is their sender ... their source ... their
reason for appearing at this time in his life. For that's
what the card implies. Problems come from God. With the further
implication being that, when sending problems your way, God
scales their severity (so as to keep their severity within
the limits of your handle-ability). The card suggests that
God knows how much you can take, and that God will not cross
that line ... go too far ... or pile on too much.
Well,
if so, wouldn't it behoove me (as a potential problem recipient)
to be weak rather than strong, so as to be able to say to
God: "Look, Lord, I'm a pretty fragile guy. My faith
is pretty weak. My strength is pretty low. My resources are
pretty few. My well is pretty dry. As trials go, I am not
up to much. And as concerns the blowing of ill winds, even
a whisper will tip me over."
Then there's
the fact that a lot of people do tip over, meaning that they
can't handle what they get. It kills `em ... splits `em ...
grinds `em down ... wears `em out ... beats their body ...
sucks their soul ... steals their faith. But why? Did God
over-expect ... figuring they could handle more than they
could? Or did they under-perform ... frustrating God by their
lack of effort? Case in point: Why is the divorce rate so
incredibly high for married couples who lose a child ... meaning
that the pain is multiplied, twice over? After the 8:15 service,
I was talking with someone who said: "After our child
died, a therapist told us that if our marriage made it, it
would be the first that he had seen." Which is probably
not something I'd say to a grieving couple. But which does
suggest that some burdens do overwhelm even the most resilient
and faithful.
Obviously,
I have a concern with the notion that life's problems are
"God given." For, while I am not exactly sure what
God gives, I keep returning to the line from Jesus: "If
we, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to our children,
how much more will our Heavenly Father give good gifts (to
his children)?"
As concerns
suffering, stuff happens. I've said it before. I'll say it
again. Stuff happens. Some of which may come from God. (I
won't discount that possibility.) But much of which may come
from us ... may come from each other ... may come from deeply
entrenched pockets of evil which, while they cannot ultimately
win the day (as Luther said), can sure make a mess of the
day ... may come from poor choices and their consequences
... may come from nature, "red in tooth and claw"
... may come from a creation that is "still growing (as
Paul says) like a woman in labor who has not yet delivered"
... or may come from cells run amok (which refuse to behave
like ordinary cells, stay in their place like ordinary cells,
or submit to correction like ordinary cells). Which brings
me to Arie Brouer.
Arie Brouer
was a Reformed pastor ... part of the Reformed Church in America.
At one time he was the General Secretary of the National Council
of Churches. And, as a Reformed pastor, he was part of the
Calvinist tradition ... a tradition that has an incredibly
strong emphasis on God's sovereign rule over the whole creation.
It was the Calvinists, after all, who crafted a theology of
predestination to affirm that God is in control of absolutely
everything. Every single move we make is orchestrated by God.
Then Arie
Brouer got cancer. A terrible theological problem for any
sensitive Christian, but especially for a Calvinist. His son
asked him about it in the most innocent way: "What does
faith mean for you, now that you are facing this?"
Arie Brouer
responded by saying he had believed in God all of his life,
and that having cancer was no reason to stop believing in
him now. To which his son said: "But you and Mom have
spent all of your lives trying to make this a better place
for all people. Isn't this a strange way to be paid back?"
So Brouer
said to his son: "Steve, I don't believe that God wants
me to have cancer. But I have come to believe during these
days that God can't do anything about it. Which raises some
very fundamental questions in me about what I have been taught
and what I have believed (over the years) about the almightiness
of God. Because if God can't stop this, then I have to come
to some new understanding of God's almightiness, or perhaps
reject it altogether. I haven't had time to think about this
because I have been too busy dealing with all sorts of survival
questions. But I'm going to work on it."
And he
did. He counted the number of times God's "almightiness"
is mentioned in the New Testament. He discovered it is only
ten times. Nine of the ten times are in the Book of Revelation
... the last book of the Bible ... one vision of the end of
history. He said: "I looked at those texts that talk
about God's almightiness, and I discovered that every one
of them has to do with God's ultimate triumph in history.
They say that at the end of history, God's love, justice and
peace will prevail. At the end of history, God will prevail
in the struggle. But they also say that God is with us now
in the struggle. And I said to myself, `Arie, why in the world
haven't you understood this before?'"
*
* * * *
Like I
said in my subtitle, I ponder these things. No, that's not
quite right, I worry over these things. "Anguish"
might even be a better word. I worry in all kinds of places
... places like funeral homes, hospital corridors, parking
lots, bedrooms (especially my bedroom, at 3:00 in the morning).
I have reached some humbly-held conclusions that work for
me. I say "humbly-held," because who can really
be sure? I mean, the Calvinists could be right. I could be
wrong. Obviously, I don't think so. Otherwise I'd join them.
But I'll tell you what I do believe (and hold in humble hands).
I believe that not everything that comes is either good ...
or from God. But I believe that "in everything"
that comes, God can work good to those who are open to the
possibility (see Romans 8:28).
I believe
that God does not send pennies from heaven ... shingles from
heaven ... tumors from heaven ... or tremors from heaven.
But I do believe that God sends Jesus from heaven who, as
the catechism says, will be with us now ... and at the ending
of our days. Meaning that there will be at least one traveling
companion in the valley, and one road from the valley. Even
Death Valley.
Garth
Brooks (to whom I listen every time my daughter is in the
car) has made a fortune singing:
Well,
I suppose that's something. But I've got a friend in high
places ... who is no stranger to low places.
Who chases
my blues away. Gonna be okay.
Note:
I am indebted to Mark Trotter for supplying the personal testimony
of Arie Brouer.
|