|
Last Sunday,
Harold Melin ushered in the center aisle at 9:30. This Sunday,
Harold is in Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital with heart problems.
He needs a pacemaker. But, so far, they haven't been able
to install one. It seems that Harold has funny veins. They
cross ... where they aren't supposed to.
Harold
was feeling pretty "punk" last Sunday. Weak. Dizzy.
He wasn't himself at all. Besides, Sunday wasn't even his
day to usher ... or his crew's day to usher. It was Dale Parker's
day. But Dale called Harold earlier in the week and said:
"I am short five, Harold. Can you give me a hand?"
To which Harold said: "Sure" ... earlier in the
week ... when he felt good.
By Sunday,
he felt sufficiently dizzy so as to joke with Betty about
having her sit on the center aisle. That way, if he fumbled
the plate, she would be there to catch the contents. Which
amused her. But which also alarmed her. So she said to Harold:
"If you're feeling that lousy, why are you going?"
To which Harold said: "Because I promised Dale."
You can
debate the wisdom of that until the cows come home. In point
of fact, Harold came. Harold collected. And Harold didn't
spill. By the time Harold went home, he wasn't feeling any
better. But he wasn't feeling any worse. He wasn't trying
to be heroic. As he said to me: "I was sure I could make
it ... and I promised Dale." But I also know of five
people who promised Bob Smith (on the Thursday before World
Communion Sunday) that they would come and serve the elements.
Except they didn't. And none of them called Bob, begging off.
Neither did they line up replacements. Which doesn't make
them sinners. Or Harold, a saint. But it is interesting, in
its own little way.
I am a
promise keeper. Always have been. Probably always will be.
I was a promise keeper before Bill McCartney called everyone
wearing trousers to the Silverdome to participate in a Christian
male bonding experience of the same name. Concerning "Promise
Keepers," I went once. Thought it was a good thing. Although,
not necessarily my thing. Having been there, I'm not sure
what all of the critics are worried about. I just saw a lot
of guys hearing some important stuff, and agreeing to hold
up some important stuff, like the Lord ... their wives ...
their kids ... and their pastors. What's more, they seemed
to be having a pretty good time doing it. Sort of like deer
camp ... with altar calls.
But, rallies
or no rallies, promises are things I like to keep and hate
to break. If I tell you I'll be somewhere, I usually am. If
I tell you I'll do something, I usually do. Although I do
over-commit. That's because I hate to turn anything ... or
anybody ... down. Meaning that sometimes I say too many "yesses"
for my own good ... even though, when I say them, I believe
I am focusing upon your own good. If I have heard one constant
refrain throughout my ministry, it has come from well-meaning
people telling me I should learn how to say "No."
And they're right. Not because they are saving my strength
... or my sanity. But because they're saving me from sin,
don't you see. I am talking about the sin of pastoral omnipotence
... your dependence exaggerates my importance (as if I am
the only one who can say it, pray it, preach it or perform
it). You have no idea how insidiously tempting that is. Nor
do you know how hard I battle against it.
So I try
to prioritize my promises. And parcel my promises. So that
the right things get done ... at the right time ... for the
right reasons. And so that somebody, looking at my date book
and my checkbook, might (someday) be able to preach my eulogy
from those two documents alone. And make me look good. While
I've got a way to go with both, I'll take my chances.
But while
it may sound like pandering to myself, kindly allow me to
suggest that both church and culture suffer more from those
who under-promise, than from those who over-promise. I am
talking about people who are afraid to give their word on
much of anything ... to much of anyone. Such folk may have
a ton of reasons ... including poor models by both parents
and peers. I mean, if you don't know anybody who ever said
it and stuck by it, I suppose you can't be faulted for exhibiting
similar behavior. But that's a sermon for another day. I promise.
You can take it to the bank.
Instead,
I want to say a word about the perception that promise-making
is overly-confining. To the degree that if you promise to
go here, you can't go there. And if you promise to do this,
you can't do that. And most of us want to do it all. Or we
don't want to make a decision on something lesser (early),
that would close the door on something better (late). One
reason that kids make so many last minute decisions is that
they never know when a better offer might come down the pike.
Or over the pager. Which makes a ton of sense when you're
a kid. But there comes a point when such behavior becomes
inexcusable ... like when you're not a kid anymore, yet still
doing it.
But even
in those days of childhood and adolescence ... when character
is the consistency of under-chilled Jello ... it is the wise
parent who helps a kid follow through on promises made. If
your kid tries out for a team ... if you buy all the equipment
the team requires ... if everybody's schedule is rearranged
so that team practices can be honored and team games can be
watched ... only to have the kid decide (four games into the
season) that "this isn't any fun, because I'm not any
good" ... quitting ought not be automatic or immediate.
Rather, the conversation should begin with the question: "When
does the season end?" Followed by the question: "What
can we do to help you see it through to that point, so that
it might be a relatively decent experience?" Some families
call that "follow through." Others call it "character
formation."
People
with "follow through" are precious in a church.
Because you never have to worry about them. It will be done
on time. And it will be done well. In a world where you've
got to worry about many, you don't have to worry about them.
I can't tell you what that means to somebody like me. And
if I tried telling you, you wouldn't understand. Because you
don't do what I do for a living. And you don't wake up at
three o'clock in the morning ... most mornings ... and go
through the entire laundry list of tasks for the day (yours
and everybody else's) ... .wondering who you have to check
up on, which staff members you have to prod, and which parishioners
you have to birddog. But I am one of the lucky ones. I can
get back to sleep. That's because I know that most of you
are not only as good as your word, but better.
Not that
you always felt like it. Or that I always felt like it, either.
But that's what's so wonderful about promises made and kept.
They help us ride the rapids of feelings ... which are notoriously
fickle and seasonal. Let me clue you in on something. You're
not always going to be "up" for everything ... or
everybody.
By the
time next Saturday rolls around, I will have performed ten
weddings in the month of October. Which is too many. I'll
be the first to admit it. Thanks to Dick Cheatham and the
preparatory classes he is teaching, I have increased confidence
that we are doing the prep work with integrity. And now that
we've fleshed out the staff, we need to broaden out the work.
But whether
ten is two too many, four too many or six too many, I don't
have the faintest idea. All I know is that I promised to do
ten. So I am following through with ten. And I will work hard
to do them well, quite apart from the degree to which I am
"into" any particular one of them. I may have told
you this before. But a few minutes before any wedding, I stand
back in the sacristy and take a few moments to center myself.
And, in those moments, I say something like this.
Ritter,
that couple doesn't know that they are your 43rd
wedding this year. Nor do they know that you had to cut
short some other activity to get dressed and come down here.
They don't know that your mind may be on your sermon (in
its last two pages) ... or the Michigan game (in its last
two minutes).
Ritter,
this is not about you. This is about them. And if you do
this right ... and if they do this right ... this is the
only wedding they are ever going to have. Besides, if you
really believe all that stuff about men leaving their mamas,
cleaving to their wives and becoming one flesh (which is
a marvelous symbol, not to mention one heck of a lot of
fun), then God is in the middle of whatever it is you are
getting ready to go out there and do. So suck it up and
get with the program.
And it
works. Every single time. If I do what I promised to do (even
on Saturdays when I don't feel like doing it), maybe they'll
do what they are promising to do (on days when they don't
feel like doing it, either).
Because
they won't, you know. Always feel like it, I mean. And what
will sustain them then? You know what darn well what will
sustain them then. The promise. That's what will sustain them
then.
Some mornings
you bounce out of bed ... put your hand to your wrist ...
take the pulse of your feeling for your spouse ... and find
it to be incredible. It flows. It surges. It's barely containable
in the skin. You count upwards of 200-300 beats per minute.
Other mornings you reach for the same wrist ... search for
the same pulse ... checking out your feeling for the same
spouse. And it's barely discernable. You search the other
pulse points (neck, temple, elbow). You can't find one. Does
that mean that it's dead between you?
No, it
just means that you get up and work a little harder at being
married. Not at raising a pulse. The pulse will take care
of itself ... if you work at the marriage part. Some days
marriage is a felt activity. Other days, marriage is a willed
activity. But if you continue to will it when you don't feel
it, feeling usually returns. I'll never forget the woman who
said to her husband: "Some days, John, I stay married
to you because I can't resist you. Other days, I stay married
to you because I said I would."
But here's
where I want to suggest a little shift in your thinking. I
have been talking about making and keeping promises as if
doing so were a task ... a job ... a chore ... a monumental
effort. Which it will seem like to some of you, given your
relative lack of experience. But let me depict it differently.
Less like work. More like pleasure. Less like burden. More
like blessing. I told you earlier that I have kept a lot of
promises in my life. But it's time for me to let you in on
a little secret. It is the promises I have kept, that have
kept me.
Some of
you have heard me tell this story. If so, bear with me. If
not, listen up. A prospective member in one of my churches
once asked: "Of what advantage is joining your church?
What will I get that I can't get now? What will I be able
to do, that I can't do now?" And I wished I could have
offered him a toaster, a clock radio, or four seats on the
center aisle for the 9:30 service on Easter Sunday. But I
couldn't. In point of fact, I couldn't offer him anything.
Pretty much everything he could do as a member, he could do
as a non-member. At least in my church. That's because I'm
not into line drawing or gate keeping.
As a non-member,
he can worship here ... work here ... study here ... sing
here. He can join any group. He can take any class. He can
sing in any choir. What's more, I'll marry his daughter, baptize
his grandkid, bury his mother-in-law, or visit his sick neighbor
(in the event he should ask). And it would never occur to
me to withhold from his lips, the body and blood of our Lord
Jesus Christ.
"Well,"
he said, "that being the case, why don't I just go on
like I've been going on? I'll sit in your pew. I'll shake
your hand at the door. I'll put my dues in your plate."
Whereupon I did remind him that membership would open a couple
of doors to him. Without it, he would never be able to become
a Trustee or get himself elected as president of the United
Methodist Women. But the world is not beating down any doors
for Trustee positions. And I don't know three persons out
of 3,000 who want to be president of the United Methodist
Women. So none of this was likely to cut much ice. Which was
when the Spirit pulled that little chain that hangs from the
light bulb in my head, leading me to say: "Let me put
it to you this way."
Once upon
a time ... July 2, 1966 ... along about five past three ...
I was standing (fit to kill) at the head of a very long aisle
in Dearborn. Looking around the room, it seemed as if there
were 5,000 to the left of me and 5,000 to the right of me.
When the organ swelled, virtually every last one of those
10,000 people stood. And as she moved down the aisle ... radiantly
alive and headed in my general direction ... I said to myself:
"Wow! This isn't just hanging out with Kristine Larson
anymore." Which it wasn't. But you know what? That promise
... made that day ... to that lady ... has (in large part)
made me.
Whereupon,
I went on to say to my quizzical friend: "I think joining
the church is a little like that. You can hang out with the
Lord and the Lord's friends forever. But if you are anything
like me, it is the `yesses' you say ... to the things that
matter most ... that wind up making all the difference."
You know,
it amazes me when I think of all the things I don't know (still
don't) about marriage ... fatherhood ... friendship ... membership
in the Church of Jesus Christ ... Jesus Christ ... the ministry
... my previous three churches ... this church. Yet, that's
my life. Right there. In a nutshell. Take away those things
and there's nothing left. Or not much left. I have given my
life to such as these ("Husbands, love your wives as
Christ loved the church"). What's more, I've gotten it
back.
*
* * * *
There
is popular wisdom out there which says: "Never promise
anybody anything." Don't believe it, dear friends. Don't
believe it.
Robert
Frost ends his signature poem with the lines:
The implication
being that, on the day you stop keeping promises, you'll run
out of miles.
Note:
This sermon launched First Church's annual stewardship campaign,
bearing the title "Know the Spirit, Keep the Promise."
Prior to reading the texts, I talked about the word "promise"
in scripture. More often than not, it appears as a noun. It
refers to the promise (or promises) of God. Far fewer are
the times that it occurs as a verb. Yet the entire body of
biblical literature suggests a tension between the promises
God makes and the promises we break.
Prior
to the sermon, I read (and commented on) God's initial promise
to Abraham, given that Paul considers that promise to be the
critical covenant of the Hebrew Bible, subsequently fulfilled
in Jesus Christ (II Corinthians 1:20). Then I read the portion
of Ephesians 5 dealing with husbands loving wives as Christ
loves the church. My purpose was to lift up a paradigm of
promise keeping that would link the institutions of matrimony
and membership. Thus, I was able to set a stage for the "marriage
material" that followed in the sermon itself.
|