|
The
Text
The Book
of Revelation contains some of the most sublime, yet frightening
images to be found anywhere in Holy Scripture. Let me read
two such images, contained within the same passage.
Then
I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven
and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no
more. And I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming
down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned
for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne
saying, "See, the home of God is among mortals. He
will dwell with them as their God; they will be his peoples,
and God himself will be with them; he will wipe every tear
from their eyes. Death will be no more; mourning and crying
and pain will be no more, for the first things have passed
away.
And
the one who was seated on the throne said, "See, I
am making all things new." Also he said, "Write
this, for these words are trustworthy and true." Then
he said to me, "It is done! I am the Alpha and the
Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will
give water as a gift from the spring of the water of life.
Those who conquer will inherit these things, and I will
be their God and they will be my children. But as for the
cowardly, the faithless, the polluted, the murderers, the
fornicators, the sorcerers, the idolaters, and all liars,
their place will be in the lake that burns with fire and
sulfur, which is the second death." Revelation 21:1-8.
The
Sermon
My friends,
I've been to Hell and I've been to Paradise ... and I'm here
to tell you that neither of `em is much to write home about.
Hell is a Livingston County burg ... out Pinckney way ...
which neither the developers nor the Methodists have yet discovered,
and whose chief claim to fame is a post office, so that you
can send your friends greetings from Hell or invitations to
it. As you would expect, it's warmer in Hell than in Paradise,
given that Hell is located in Michigan's banana belt, while
Paradise sits up there in Michigan's ice box.
Paradise
is on Whitefish Bay, located in the general vicinity of places
like Newberry, St. Ignace and Sault Ste. Marie. I once spent
one of the least memorable weeks of my life in Paradise. Having
just been ordained (with a wife, a child, and no money), they
said: "Come preach in Paradise on Sunday morning and
you can have a vacation cottage, free for the week."
Well, the cottage was an old farm house with next-to-no furniture.
The TV (if you jostled the coat hanger against the window
screen just right) got one channel's worth of snow. The fish
flies hit the beach the week we arrived. And my wife got strep
throat. But I preached on Sunday. We grilled a couple of decent
whitefish. And, three nights out of six, we went with 20 other
carloads of gawkers, to the rim of the dump at nightfall,
our purpose being to watch a bunch of emaciated bears come
out of the woods and paw through the garbage. Which was crazy.
But which was the stellar attraction in Paradise. Maybe the
only attraction in Paradise.
So much
for my knowledge of Hell and Paradise. And so much for your
lesson in Michigan geography. For more than that, you'll have
to wait until you die. Although there was, just a few weeks
back, that word from Pope John Paul II ... now 21 years into
his reign ... about heaven and hell not being as locatable
as some might have previously thought. It seems that John
Paul, in his papal wisdom, doesn't think of either heaven
or hell as places, so much as he thinks of them as relationships.
To be precise, what he said was this. "More than a physical
place, hell is the state of those who freely and definitively
separate themselves from God, the source of all life and joy."
Then he went on to describe hell as "the pain, frustration
and emptiness of life without God," adding that "eternal
damnation is not so much God's work, as our own doing."
Concerning heaven, the Holy Father suggested that "it
was not a physical place in the clouds, but a living and personal
relationship of union with the Holy Trinity ... of which a
foretaste could be had here on earth."
Well,
a lot of folk reacted to that ... both positively and negatively.
Among them were some of you, who rushed to ask me: "Is
he right?" To which I answered: "Sure, I think he's
right." But what do I know? What do any of us know? We
all open our Bibles and claim our passages. But, concerning
the specifics of eternal life, scripture is longer on theology
than geography ... longer on promise than description. For
wherever you go in its pages, I think you have to start and
end with Paul (whose understanding of the faith defined the
earliest proclamation of the church). Concerning death, Paul
said: "Behold, I hand you a mystery. We shall not all
sleep, but we shall all be changed." While concerning
eternal life, Paul wrote: "Our eyes have not seen ...
our ears have not heard ... our minds have not begun to imagine,
let alone comprehend, the things that God has prepared for
those who love him."
I have
spent the better part of the last week, retracing the development
of heaven and hell (as concepts) in the literature of the
Old and New Testaments, along with related materials from
the annals of Buddhism and Islam. And while it would provide
fascinating seminar material (which I'll offer if there's
a market for it), there is nothing resembling a thread of
consistency that could lead one to say (with any degree of
certainty): "Lo here. Lo there."
It is
probably important to know that in early near-eastern thought,
both heaven and hell were thought of as parts of the observable
universe, rather than distinct from the observable universe
... either as mountains that towered above the earth, or subterranean
pits that lie buried beneath it. Other theories visualized
heaven as being the firmament-like canopy that encircled the
earth, or the space directly above it.
The Old
Testament refers to heaven as "God's abode" (I Kings
8:30), from which God exercises sovereign rule (Psalm 29:20)
and to which God will welcome the faithful righteous (Psalm
73:24). Ironically, when the beloved 23rd Psalm
suggests that "I will dwell in the house of the Lord
forever," the Psalmist is almost certainly referring
to the Temple in Jerusalem, rather than the "house not
made with hands, eternal in the heavens."
In the
New Testament, the Gospel of Mark suggests that heaven is
God's creation (13:33), in which God resides (Hebrews 4:24),
to which Jesus ascends (Acts 1:9), and from which he will
return (I Thessalonians 4:16).
Hell,
meanwhile, is alternately described as a "watery pit"
(Psalm 28:1), "a ditch" (Job 33:18), a subterranean
dwelling place known as "Sheol" (referenced 66 times)
or a smoldering ravine (Matthew 18:9). The latter sometimes
carries the name "Gehenna" which is taken from a
garbage dump to the south of the Dung Gate in Jerusalem, in
a valley known as "Hinnom" (hence, "Gehenna")
... where the city's refuse was said to burn day and night.
Which may very well be the source of the "Lake of Fire"
which appears (albeit unnamed) in some of the more dire prophecies
of Revelation.
Suffice
it to say "that nowhere in the Old Testament is the abode
of the dead regarded as a place of punishment and torment."
The concept of an "inferno" ... or a fiery hell
... developed in Israel only when Greek and Iranian influences
began to invade the culture. Ironically, the Islamic word
for "hell" ("Jahannam") is derived from
the very same garbage dump outside the very same gate in Jerusalem
("Gehenna" ... "the Valley of Hinnom")
which Moslems believed to be the entrance to the underworld.
Eventually, Islamic thought enhanced this picture to include
seven gates ... and (subsequently) seven layers ... which
then gave birth, over time, to the multiple levels of Dante's
Inferno, and the relative degrees of suffering, floor by floor.
Ironically,
the Koran is not all that clear as to whether Moslems are
to believe that punishment is eternal. Sura 23:106 reads:
"In Jahannam, dwelling forever." While Sura 11:108-9
attributes to Muhammad the possibility of a post-death pardon.
Apparently, the people of Islam are as split as we are, as
to how long God can stay mad at whom ... and to what degree.
I notice
your eyes starting to glaze over. This is probably more than
you wanted to know ... or have been able to digest. Suffice
it to say that where heaven and hell are concerned, the literature
is rich ... but remarkably non-specific. And the images to
which you and I turn ... when asked to recount our favorite
visualizations of heaven ... are clearly metaphorical. We
talk about "the house not made with hands, eternal in
the heavens" ... "the many mansions" where
Jesus goes to prepare a place for us ... the "great bridal
feast of the lamb" ... the "wedding banquet,"
to which everyone is invited, but not everyone RSVPs ... the
"new Jerusalem" (a reconstituted metropolis), where
the glory of the Lord is sufficient to replace the street
lamps (not to mention the sun and the moon), and where God
himself will take folded Kleenex to the corners of each and
every eye, wiping away each and every tear, until there are
no more tears. But, if pressed, I would have to say that my
favorite metaphor is that of "the holy mountain,"
to which everyone streams, and up which everyone climbs (from
north, south, east, west, land of slave, land of brave, you
name it, they're from it) ... and where "no one shall
hurt or destroy, in my holy mountain," even as "the
hills are alive with music" (you didn't know it was biblical,
did you?).
Images.
Of course they're images. But not images of location, so much
as images of relationship. Relationships restored. Relationships
redeemed. Relationships that once were so very wrong, but
now are so very right. Which is why the Pope says that heaven
and hell are far more relational than they are spatial ...
and that we shall know them, not by what we see, but by how
we feel.
I can
see why his Holiness bothered some folk with all this talk
about heaven and hell "not being places." You and
I are creatures of space and time. We want to know where things
are ... what they are going to look like ... and how we will
know we've arrived, once we get there. Jesus tells Thomas:
"I'm going where you cannot follow ... but you know the
way." And what does Thomas ask for? Directions, that's
what he asks for. Does he get `em? No ... not in so many words.
Neither does he get any maps, charts, graphs, or printouts
from the computer.
But we
shouldn't be too hard on Thomas ... or on the Pope's detractors.
We want directions too ... along with maps and pictures. We
want someone to say: "Heaven is here. It looks like this.
Hell is there. It looks like that." Spatial identification.
That's what we want. How does the old story go? A man comes
home early from the office, only to find his wife under the
bedspread and his best friend in the closet. Says the man
to his friend: "Fred, what are you doing here?"
Says Fred: "Everybody's gotta be someplace." And
there's a certain attractiveness to knowing where that place
is. I understand that.
But instinctively
we know ... don't we ... that the truest descriptions of heaven
and hell have more of a "feeling tone" than they
do a "spatial tone." Somebody goes through a rough
patch on a job ... in a marriage ... or with one of their
kids. To anyone who will listen, they say: "I feel like
I've been to hell and back." But what does that mean?
Are they talking about where they went? Or are they talking
about how they felt? You know darned well what they're talking
about. They are talking about something that happened to a
very important relationship ... and how they felt about it.
They are talking about separation, not location. They are
talking about how it feels to be out of sorts ... out of sync
... out of touch ... out of trust. They are talking about
being disconnected ... not belonging ... cut off and set apart
... when every fiber of body, mind and spirit is crying: "This
is not the way it should be."
Contrast
this with a song that will date me.
No they
aren't. They're living at 236 Elm Street. But 236 Elm Street
is not heavenly language. "Molly, me and baby" is
heavenly language.
If you
can understand that on the lyrical level, perhaps you can
translate it to the spiritual level. To be "one with
God," says the Pope, "is heaven." To be "cut
off from God," says the Pope, "is hell." Think
about it this way. People are free in this world to live solely
for themselves and let the rest go hang. What the Doctrine
of Hell proclaims is that they are free to do it in the next
world, too. Meaning that the possibility of making a damned
fool of yourself is virtually limitless. You can play it out
forever. It's your choice.
Sure,
hell exists. I've visited there. Didn't much like it. But
some people seem not to mind. Still, the question arises:
"Who put `em there?" They did. It is not God's will
that any should perish. Which means that the hell-bent among
us aren't being pushed, sent, consigned or abandoned ... but
are motoring along quite nicely on their own, thank you. If
I look at your behavior ... your choices ... your deviations
and addictions, and say (in all compassionate candor): "Friend,
you're a damned fool" ... am I talking about something
God is doing, or something you are doing? I'm talking about
you, and the fact that damnation is a self-started journey
down a self-chosen road. Which is also what the Pope said
last month.
Ah, but
is it eternal? I suppose it could be. But I doubt it is. Not
that any of us are going to be able to avoid "paying
the piper." Sooner or later, it all catches up with us.
Or God catches up with us. And then there's "hell to
pay." You probably don't like hearing me say that. But
let me explain what I mean. I think hell is coming face-to-face
with the consequences of our sin. The essence of divine judgment
is not God telling us what we did ... screaming at us for
what we did ... berating, beating or burning us for what we
did ... but just letting us see what we did. And when that
happens, all the lies we told ourselves ... all the crap we
fed ourselves ... all the rationalizations we concocted ...
all the justifications we offered ... all the silly, sickly,
self-serving spins we put on our sins ... not to mention all
the various forms of Maalox we swallowed to quiet the rumbling
in our gut ... none of it works. None of it works. Meaning
that we are forced to face it ... forced to own it ... forced
to taste and feel it. Until it hurts like what? Well ... like
hell.
Studdart
Kennedy tells (in one of his books) of a father who, in fits
of drunkenness, used to beat his son. In his sober moments,
he loved the lad dearly. Now, however, the boy is dying and
his suddenly sobered father is keeping a vigil beside his
bed. In his fevered delirium, the child sees the father reach
out to stroke his sweating brow. Instinctively, the boy flinches,
brushes his father's hand away and cries: "Don't let
him hit me, Mother. Don't let him hit me." Hell is seeing,
for the first time, the results of what we do. The book is
open and the judgment is self applied.
But will
God leave us that way eternally? The house, as you know, divides
on that one. There are those who say: "If you die before
you get it right ... get it reconciled ... get it redeemed
... too late for you." But I am not one of them. I have
this suspicion that God will hound us, haunt us, claw and
search for us, not only unto death, but into death. "If
I make my bed in Sheol," says the Psalmist, "even
there shalt thou find me."
I do not
believe that God wills our death ... .either as to the way
we die ... or as to the day we die. If I leave the
pulpit this morning, only to perish beneath the wheels of
an out-of-control tractor trailer on Telegraph (or an out-of-control
semi on Six Mile), I do not believe either the choice or the
timing of my demise to be divine. So it leads me to wonder:
"Why should such circumstances ... not of God's making
... set an outer limit as to how far God will go for me, assuming
that I die in an out-of-sorts relationship with Him? Should
such a thing happen, isn't it possible that God might be saying
(at that very moment), "Rats, I almost had Ritter,"
rather than: "Oh well, to hell with him."
Truck
or no truck ... stroke or no stroke ... death or no death
... I believe that God will have us. I believe that God will
be as relentless as He is restless. And I believe that no
fool ... however self-damned ... will remain hell-bent (or
hell-bound) eternally. I simply can't imagine that the God
who went to the cross for me, will not go to the grave for
me.
Last week
I watched, along with most of you, the video clips from Turkey
... when the earth opened up its jaws and buried several thousand
of its children alive. And the pictures I couldn't get out
of my head were of family members ... with no more chance
of success than a snowball's chance in hell ... pulling, pushing,
tugging at the rocks and the rubble, hoping against hope that
the lost might be found and the swallowed, reclaimed.
Then,
yesterday morning, I talked with an adoptive parent who has
been to hell and back ... over and over again ... year after
heart-wrenching year ... with both a daughter and a son who
never call unless it's for money and who never return unless
it's for rescue. "Why can't I let them go?" she
said. "Why can't I let them go?"
How did
Mendelssohn address that?
(singing)
"He watching over Israel, slumbers not nor sleeps."
What's
that all about? Is God an insomniac? Darned if I know. But
ask yourself (especially if you've ever been a parent), how
soundly did you ever sleep until your last remaining child
was home?
|