|
Let's
start with a word about economies and how they change, or
birthday cakes and how they evolve. Back in the days of the
agrarian economy (when most of us lived on farms or depended
upon those who did), mothers made birthday cakes from scratch,
mixing farm commodities like flour, sugar, butter and eggs,
that together cost mere dimes.
As the
farms gave way to the factories ... and as the agrarian economy
gave way to the Industrial Revolution ... moms paid a dollar
or two to Betty Crocker for birthday cake ingredients that
were already pre-mixed and pre-boxed.
Later,
when the service economy took its place alongside of the industrial
economy, busy moms ordered cakes from the bakery or the grocery
store, which (at $10 or $15 a pop) cost ten times as much
as the ingredients that Betty Crocker provided.
Now, in
the time-starved nineties, moms no longer bake the cake or
even buy it and bring it home. Instead, they are likely to
spend $100 or more to "out source" the entire event
to McDonald's, Chuck E. Cheese's, or some other entertainment
emporium that will stage a memorable event for kids (and probably
throw in the cake for free).
"Welcome
to the experience economy." Which is not so much my greeting
as that of Joseph Pine and James Gilmore, who are the co-authors
of a book entitled Every Business a Stage: Why Customers
Now Want Experiences. Truth be told, I haven't read their
book. But, thanks to Bill Burnett, I did read their article
in the Harvard Business Review published in July of
this year. And they make an interesting case. They suggest
that from now on, leading-edge companies will find that the
next competitive battleground lies, not in providing goods
or services, but in staging experiences. Unless companies
want to fall by the wayside, they will be compelled to upgrade
their offerings to this newest stage of consumer gratification.
But how
does an experience differ from a service ... and how do you
sell it? Some of you remember the old television series, Taxi,
and a rather sleazy character named Jim Ignatowski (who sometimes
went by the title Rev. Jim). One day, Jim decided to become
the best taxi driver in New York. So he served sandwiches
and beverages to his passengers, conducted guided tours of
Manhattan, and even sang Frank Sinatra tunes while cruising
the city. By engaging his riders in a way that turned an ordinary
cab ride into a memorable event, Jim gave them something decidedly
extra for their money. His customers responded by giving bigger
tips. And a few even asked him to drive around the block one
more time, the better to prolong the enjoyment.
Now all
kinds of businesses are trying to get in on the act. Earlier
this fall, I told you of my invitation to attend the grand
opening of the Kroger store in downtown Birmingham. As one
who seldom frequents such places, I declined. But then I began
to understand that I had missed something. So I went to see
for myself. And what I discovered was that this was "not
my father's grocery store." It engaged all of my senses.
There were things to look at ... things to smell ... things
to taste. There were things to stretch my imagination, from
seaweed to sushi. And while I haven't been back many times
since, the Kroger people have broken through my earlier barriers,
thus guaranteeing return visits at some time in the future.
Or consider
movie theaters. I used to fork over my money and sit down
to see a film. But now the owner of the Star Theater complex
in Southfield suggests that "it should be worth the price
of the movie just to enter his building." Which is why
the Star Theater annually charges its 3 million customers
a 25 percent higher admission than the local competitor down
the street, because of the fun-house experience it provides.
And with 65,000 square feet of restaurants and stores being
added to the complex, it is not inconceivable that Star will
charge us to walk through the front door, whether we ever
see a movie or not.
Which
brings me to Great Lakes Crossing. Some of you wondered about
its inclusion in this morning's title. Actually, when I selected
the title, I'd never been to the mall. I feel about outlet
malls pretty much as I feel about grocery stores ... maybe
even worse. But I kept hearing those advertisements promising
"eye-popping, heart-stopping, jaw-dropping shopping."
And I kept reading about traffic jams at the Joslyn Road exit,
not to mention five hour waits at some of the mall's more
popular restaurants.
So last
Thursday night, I took a little field trip. In the company
of my wife (a seasoned shopper), I actually spent two hours
in the place. Not that my heart stopped, mind you. In fact,
I was rather disappointed. To be sure, the place was big.
There was a food court "half the size of Utah."
And there were 204 places that would have been glad to take
my money, had I chosen to part with any. But half of the shops,
I'd never heard of. And the biggest discounts were clearly
reserved for the least popular items. I did take a closer
look at a place called Neiman Marcus' Last Call (which sounded
like a title chosen by a bartender rather than a retailer).
And it looked like the sale of a bunch of stuff that nobody
else had wanted. Which didn't do much for making me want it,
either.
The restaurants
were cool. There was a place with the word "Alcatraz"
in its title, offering me the opportunity to bite a burger
behind bars. But having spent quite a bit of time in prison
the last few weeks, that was the last thing I wanted to do.
So Kris and I tried the Rainforest Café ... where it
really does rain ... right beside you ... all the time. I
didn't stay long enough for mold to grow on my sport coat.
But the food was decent. And there were animated animals,
ranging from elephants to crocodiles. Which were fun the first
time. And my grandchildren might like them a second time ...
if and when I ever have grandchildren. But I passed on buying
a T-shirt. And probably won't go back anytime in the near
future. It's a mall, for crying out loud. Although others
would call it "the wave of the future."
Notice
that in my mild critique of Great Lakes Crossing, I said less
about my shopping than about my experience. Which didn't match
the hype ... or my expectation. Had I actually bought something
and saved several dollars in the process, I might have come
home thrilled. But I did not go there to purchase a product.
Nor was I invited there to purchase a product. I was invited
to participate in a pleasure. Which did beat cleaning the
leaves out of the gutter. But not by a lot.
Still,
this "enchantment with experience" intrigues me,
given the degree to which I find it impacting the church.
Increasingly, people come not just to "get something"
or "give something," but to "experience something."
For years, people who studied the church market (the better
to instruct marketing dummies like me), said that what people
wanted from the church were a wider-range and better-quality
of goods and services. Sunday schools for the small ones.
Youth groups for the growing (and, potentially, straying ones).
Choirs (vocal, bell, handchime, instrumental, folk, soft rock
and praise) for the musical ones. Teams for the athletic ones.
Support groups for the troubled ones. Growth groups for the
searching ones. Social groups for the gregarious ones. Work
projects for the handsy ones. Day trips for the antsy ones.
And seminars for the studious ones. Every year ... more. Every
year ... better.
Which
was a message I heard. But now, I am told, there is another
shift. One which is more subtle ... less specific ... harder
to classify ... harder, still, to satisfy. People are now
coming "to experience something." And when they
do, they are not altogether sure what it was. But they announce
a willingness to come back (as they tell me), because they
liked the "feel" of the place. Which puts a lot
of pressure, don't you see, on those of us responsible for
creating the "feel" of the place ... given that
we don't fully understand this phenomenon, and don't agree
100 percent among ourselves about what a fitting and proper
church of Jesus Christ ought to "feel like" in the
first place.
But there
is one thing I do know. This business of "experiencing
church" is never more pronounced than at Christmastime
... when people who seldom darken our doors suddenly find
themselves streaming through them. Which is fine by me. You
will never hear this preacher decrying (or denying) the "C
and E crowd," or the "twicesters" as some of
my colleagues call them. Because I, for one, can't always
tell the mildly curious from the deeply devout. And even religious
voyeurs, peering through the Christmas Eve darkness from the
shadowed corners of the balcony, would appear to be looking
for something. Although I doubt that many of them understand
the nature of their search, or the depth of their need to
be here.
At Duke
Chapel, they have already announced (well in advance) that
the ushers will close the doors to the 11:00 p.m. service
after 1700 persons have been admitted to the sanctuary. This
is in response to a would-be congregant (last year) who berated
the head usher, screaming: "This is Christmas Eve. You've
got to let me in. I've got my rights. You can't keep me outta
church on Christmas Eve." I doubt that anybody (usher
... preacher ... screamer) fully understood what lay behind
his behavior ... or his need. All I know is that when you
are hungry ... and somebody tells you there is a two hour
wait at the restaurant ... more than your stomach will growl.
But (on
Christmas Eve) hungry for what? I'm not always sure. Certainly
for something old. An old story. Several old songs. An old
face. An old faith. Certainly, an old feeling ("I came
Christmas Eve, and got that old feeling"). And perhaps
(just perhaps) an old assurance ... that the timeless verities
we trumpet at Christmas (sometimes to the point of spirit-numbing
banality) are still verities (meaning still "true").
I'm talking about things like peace, love and joy ... light
in the dark places ... highways in the crooked places ...
songs in the silent places ... those sorts of things. Christmas
Eve is the one time of year when the sheep come to be fed
yesterday's food ... having remembered that it filled them
once ... desperately hoping against hope that it will fill
them again. And in a world where cruise missiles are falling,
impeachment votes are flying, and Marcy Devernay's list of
20,000 names is longer than Santa Claus', who can blame them.
But in
addition to being hungry for something old, I think they (and
we) are also hungry for something deep ... perhaps too deep
for human telling. I'm talking about a mystery that cannot
be explained, so much as entered into (which is another word
for "experienced" ... which is another word for
"felt"). Unlike the late Joe Friday of the L.A.P.D.,
people come on Christmas Eve wanting more than "just
the facts."
It took
me awhile to learn it ... but learn it I did ... that nobody
comes to church on Christmas Eve for an explanation of the
incarnation. And when, in a darkened sanctuary we sing "Round
yon virgin, mother and child," no one is interested in
debating gynecology or paternity (not that such subjects aren't
important ... but, at that moment, hardly appropriate). Whenever
people tell me they're having a hard time "getting Christmas,"
they are not talking about a problem with the intellect, but
a problem with the emotions.
So what
is this mystery that the church would have us enter? Namely,
that God has not, will not, and perhaps (if God be true to
God's nature) cannot abandon history. God is not an absentee
landlord who lets the old place run down because he doesn't
live there anymore ... .doesn't go there anymore ... and doesn't
care what happens there anymore. Rather, God is a stakeholder
in history ... in humanity ... and in the happenings of ordinary
human beings like you and me. If Easter is about a God who
comes back to collect us at life's end, then Christmas is
about a God who comes to "comfort us" in life's
middle.
How can
this be? Well ... come and see! That's the answer of the carols.
That's the answer of the gospels. That's the answer of the
shepherds. That's the answer of the angels. That's the answer
of the star. And that's the answer of pretty much everybody
in the Gospel of John ... from Philip speaking to Nathanael
... from the eleven speaking to Thomas ... from the blind
guy speaking to the Pharisees ... and from a five-times-married
lady speaking to a bunch of guys who used to pick her up at
a local watering hole. Come and see. "O taste and see
how gracious the Lord is" (Psalm 34:8). Meaning, move
in ... draw near ... come close ... open up ... drink it in
(first with your eyes, then with your heart).
And how
might one do that? Well, it depends on whether you are a kid
or a parent. If you are a kid, all it takes is putting on
a costume. I mean, which one of us (at least one time in our
lives) didn't don a bathrobe, lace up some sandals, put a
crook in our hands or attach some wings to our back, and stand
around some straw-filled box with a plastic baby in it. Most
of the really good Christmas stories have to do with something
silly or sublime that once happened when a bunch of neophyte
munchkins answered a casting call for a script that began:
"Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way."
In fact,
Sue Ives tells me that 105 kids have signed up to take part
in our 4:30 p.m. reenactment on Christmas Eve ... meaning
that we truly will have a host of angels and (perchance) an
entire brigade of kings. We could, I suppose, have multiple
Marys. But Kate Wilcox tells me we have but one Mary suit.
And we wouldn't want to open ourselves to the promulgation
of a new (and potentially deceiving) doctrine ... namely,
group childbirth.
But, if
there is no costume that fits you and no pageant that requires
you, let me invite you to get in touch ... not with a childhood
memory ... but with a parental one. I want you to remember
the first time somebody gave you a baby to hold. Your baby
to hold. How shriveled it looked. How small it appeared. How
fragile it seemed. How proud, excited, humbled, dumbstruck
and frightened you felt. Perhaps even to the point of resolving
(as one father did) that: "I had better clean up my act
and become somebody ... because she is somebody."
What if,
on a night of great solemnity, you were to draw nigh to some
simple nativity, only to have Mary call you over ... with
a name ... with a nod ... or maybe with but the merest movement
of a finger, and say: "Yes, Ron, you ... why don't you
hold the baby ... just for a moment. Because it is your child,
you know."
What would
it feel like to hold that much of God's future for the world
... and that much of God's faith in you ... in your very own
hands?
Should
Mary make the offer, don't deny it. And, for God's sake, don't
drop it. For, as Sister Mary Corita once said: "Be, of
love, a little more careful than of anything."
Note:
I am indebted to Bill Burnett for sharing the article by Joseph
Pine and James Gilmore entitled "Every Business a Stage:
Why Customers Now Want Experiences." Look for it in the
July-August issue of Harvard Business Review. I am
equally indebted to Peter Gomes and his perceptive understanding
of the Christmas Eve congregation, which can be found in his
newest work, The Good Book, in a chapter entitled "The
Bible and Mystery." And for those not familiar with Oakland
County politics, Marcy Devernay is a highly-publicized provider
of female escorts whose "black book" allegedly contains
the names of some 20,000 citizens (many of them prominent).
|