Rescue
the perishing, care for the dying,
Snatch them in pity from sin and the grave;
Weep o'er the erring one, lift up the fallen,
Tell them of Jesus, the mighty to save.
- United Methodist Hymnal, #591
I want
you to humor me for several minutes by pretending that you
are consultants .... theological consultants .... for a short
film that is presently being made. The purpose of the film?
To depict what God has done for the world in Jesus Christ.
But since this film is being produced for an audience that
knows relatively little (if anything) about Jesus Christ,
we are going to come at the audience through the back door.
Therefore, we are not going to shoot it in Israel (or anyplace
that looks even remotely like Israel). We are going to shoot
it on a beach .... in Southern California. And we are not
going to shoot it with an actor who looks like Jesus (or anyone
who looks even remotely like Jesus .... "Send the fake
beard and bathrobe back to the costume shop, Harry").
We are going to shoot this film with a lifeguard as a stand-in
for Jesus. That's right, a lifeguard .... late twenties ....
early thirties .... blond .... muscled .... tan .... like
on Baywatch .... that kind of lifeguard.
But there's
a problem, you see. A script problem. Not because there isn't
one. But because there is one too many. Meaning that there
are two. And the director can't tell which one to use. Which
is why a team of theological consultants needs to be called
in (at the rate of $500 a day plus expenses .... thank you
very much). And that's us, don't you see? Because we know
about such things.
The first
script starts with rolling credits, even as the camera pans
a crowded beach on a Friday afternoon. Make it a Friday afternoon
in April (mid to early April). Sun shining. Music blaring.
Volleyballs flying. Acres of young, throbbing life recreating.
But, as the credits fade, we see that not everything on that
beach is quite so perfect as it seems. Because a change in
the surf is forcing the lifeguard to order all of the swimmers
out of the water. In fact, we see him descending from his
tower and posting "No Swimming" signs all along
the water's edge. About which everybody complains .... but
with which everybody complies. Out of the water they come
in twos, threes, fours-and-mores .... heading for their blankets,
their boom boxes, their lemonade (or whatever). After all,
there are other things you can do on a California beach until
the surf subsides. So why tempt fate?
Suddenly,
however, the mellow mood subsides. Everybody turns toward
the sea .... first scanning .... then screaming. The object
of all this attention being a teenage girl 100 yards off shore
.... bobbing .... weaving .... surfacing .... disappearing
.... frantically struggling (for balance .... air .... life
.... whatever). Clearly, the girl is catching the crowd's
attention. And the crowd is catching the lifeguard's attention
(who has just re-ascended his tower, after posting his signs
of warning).
So down
the ladder he comes. Out to the water he runs. To the side
of the girl he swims. Deftly reaching her in the nick of time,
he corrals her limp and lifeless body, tows her to shore and
administers cardio-pulmonary response. All the while the camera
pans the crowd, the better to cinematically record the collective
anxiety that can be seen on their faces and read on their
lips:
"My
God, is it going to work?"
"Did
he reach her in time?"
"How
did a day that started out so wonderful, go so wrong?"
"Does
anybody know who she is?"
But it
is going to work. And he does get there in time. The girl
revives. A film crew arrives. And there is wonderful footage
on the 6:00 news, including interviews with everybody but
the lifeguard. The comments, considered collectively, are
both perceptive and diverse. Some sing praises to the lifeguard
for his heroic behavior. Some cast dispersions on the girl
for her less-than-cautious approach to wind, waves and water.
Some suggest that her plight should be an object lesson to
others who play fast and loose with the rules. While others
rededicate themselves, in the spirit of the afternoon's rescue,
to keeping a watchful eye on others who may be similarly sinking
.... at sea, or anywhere else for that matter. But all agree
that they have been privy to something special .... something
very special, indeed.
That's
one script. But like I said, there are two. So let's move
quickly to the second. Same beach. Same Friday. Same crowd.
Same lifeguard. Only this time, for cinematic variety, we
start with the lifeguard walking up and down the beach, issuing
verbal warnings and waving groups of swimmers out of the water.
One girl challenges his authority to do so, telling him what
a party pooper he is, given that this is the very last day
of her very short vacation. To which he simply says: "Better
luck next time. It's just not safe."
Another
swimmer pauses to ask why he and his friends can't just stay
in the shallow part (so that the whole afternoon won't be
ruined). But all the lifeguard says is: "You can't, because
I said you can't. So move it." And when a third swimmer
complains that she thought it was a free country, the word
comes back from the lifeguard: "Not on my beach, it's
not."
But all
of this bickering is interrupted by the aforementioned shouting
and screaming. The object being the teenage girl who is struggling
and sinking. Up she comes. Under she goes. Head bobbing. Arms
flailing.
Cut to
the lifeguard. See him run. See him dive. See him swim. Harder
and harder. Faster and faster. At last, he reaches her. Grabs
for her. Has her. Loses her. Suddenly, it appears as if they
are both in trouble. The same undertow that is sucking her
under is sucking him under. In fact, we actually lose sight
of him on our screen before we lose sight of her. Then she,
too, disappears from our sight, never to return.
Now the
music turns somber. The cinematographer shadows out the sun.
And we see nothing on the screen but surging swales and circling
seagulls. Then we cut back to the crowd on the beach, pausing,
again, to look at the faces and listen to the voices.
"What's
happening?" cries one.
"I
can't see them," cries another.
"Do
you think they've both drowned?" cries a third.
"It's
terrible," cries a fourth, even while adding: "How
can God just stand by and let people die like that?"
But while
the crowd is still murmuring (as crowds at such moments are
wont to do), the camera pans back to the now-empty tower of
the lifeguard, slowly moving from sand to seat. Up the ladder
goes the lens, one rung at a time. And when it zooms in on
the place where the lifeguard had been sitting (not all that
many minutes ago), there is a close-up of a clipboard (on
which is written):
*
* * * *
As theological
consultants, it is our job to choose one script over another.
But the sole criterion for choosing is not which script we
like better, but which script more fittingly resonates with
the New Testament, as it attempts to answer the critical question:
"What, precisely, is it that God has done for the world
in Jesus Christ?"
Now I
am not going to break you into groups and have you discuss
this among yourselves. And I am not going to embarrass you
by asking for a public showing of hands. Besides, most of
you already know the right answer (to whatever degree there
might be a "right answer"). That's because you have
been preached to by good preachers. And that's because you
have studied under good teachers. So you know that the best
answer is the second script, even though your heart is not
with your head on this one. Because if you went to see this
movie .... about this lifeguard .... on this beach .... you'd
want to see the first version and not the second. And then
you'd want to stop for a Sanders hot fudge sundae on the way
home (assuming you could still find anyplace that sold Sanders
hot fudge sundaes anymore) .... proving (once again) just
how far away from home some of us have already come.
And it's
all right if you prefer the first ending. Because I prefer
it too. I mean, it's got a lot to like. It's heroic. And it's
happy. Mission impossible becomes mission accomplished. What's
more, it's more than mildly miraculous. And which of us does
not want to believe in miracles? Truth be told, was a more
honest word ever spoken about religious skepticism than the
word, "Nobody believes in miracles until he .... or she
.... desperately needs one."
I mean,
this first script will preach. And has. Over and over again.
For it says wonderful things about Jesus (who is all things
.... and who can do all things). A storm-stilling Jesus. A
tide-turning Jesus. A search-and-rescue Jesus. A miracle-working
Jesus. In short, a sight-restoring, demon-exorcising, crowd-feeding,
water-converting, dead-raising Jesus .... who will go to no
end on behalf of those who have sinned, slummed or swum too
far .... even beyond the limits that the lifeguard said were
safe, sane and secure. That'll preach. Because I have preached
it. And will preach it again.
And you
can build a marvelous ecclesiology around it ("ecclesiology"
meaning "a theology of the church"). You can preach
that first script and close each sermon with the admonition:
Go thou
and do likewise. Seek out everybody .... but especially
those who are going down for the count. Bring `em in. And
if you can't bring `em in, keep `em afloat. Feed `em. Clothe
`em. Hold `em. House `em. Enroll `em in swim classes. Set
up floating medical units, wherever the undertow is the
greatest and the shore is farthest away. And have the ushers
take up collections on the beach, gathering anything that
might be useful .... including dollars. That way, you will
never have to say to the King: "When did we see you
flailing in the water and not come to your aid?"
Ah yes,
there are bits and pieces of the gospel in the first script.
There are a ton of sermons in the first script. And there
is enough work in the first script to keep the church busy
every-which-way from Sunday .... in addition to Sunday.
But the
heart of the gospel is in the second ending. Which nobody
preaches much at all. Because it's less than happy. And less
than heroic. What's more, it doesn't offer much of an action
plan for the church. I mean, all it does is answer the question:
"What has God done for the world in Christ (that the
world, by the sum total of its own efforts, cannot do for
itself)?"
Go back
to the first script .... the lifeguard-saves-her-in-the-nick-of-time
script. Which is a good thing. And a happy thing. But not
necessarily a lasting thing. Concerning it, we can't say "all's
well that ends well" .... because we have no guarantee
that anything will really "end well." I mean, the
next day things go back to normal. The crowd goes home, forgetting
its earlier resolve to swim safer .... drive safer .... live
safer .... or love safer, for that matter. And the lifeguard
goes back to chatting up girls while trying to properly apply
his sunscreen. And the girl doesn't automatically live happily
ever after, either. Sure, she is saved from death by drowning
on a sunny Friday afternoon. But she is not necessarily saved
from the future possibility of a failed romance .... a dead-end
marriage .... men in bars, who say one thing, yet do another
thing .... not to mention migraines, muscle spasms, cramps,
cancer, bad hair days .... or, to clinch my point, from the
absolute certainty of her own death on the Friday afternoon
following her 81st birthday.
Even the
miracles of Jesus don't "fix things" finally. Not
even a bevy of blind folks seeing, lame folks walking and
crazy folks thinking, along with three dead bodies raised,
two group feedings, and one spectacular production of 180
gallons of wine for wedding guests who are already three sheets
gone to the wind .... no, none of these things constitutes
a program for fixing up history. Most of the blind of Jesus'
day remained blind. Whatever fixed 10 lepers had no positive
effect on the other 10,000. Lazarus rose, only to die again.
And 180 gallons later, one presumes that any wedding guests
still standing were forced to turn to apple juice, coffee
or skim milk.
But if
you read the gospels carefully (especially the gospel of John),
such miracles were never meant to be Jesus' program for fixing
up history .... but merely "signs" of his program
for fixing up history .... which program (when it was finally
revealed) turned out to be nothing less than Jesus dying in
history and rising beyond it. Meaning that the same Jesus
who cannot fix everything can, at least, fix the one thing
that matters ultimately.
Which,
too, will preach. Except nobody preaches it much .... except
on Good Friday .... when nobody comes to listen. Which is
also when (in the spirit of Christian neighborliness) we rotate
the service from sanctuary to sanctuary, so that even if some
of us have something to say, it's only one year out of four
that we get a chance to say it .... and maybe, then, in the
2:30 time slot when everybody's gone home.
So what
is the Good Friday message? Well, what did the clipboard say?
And what
did Paul say?
For
Jews demand signs and Greeks demand wisdom. But we preach
Christ crucified. For the foolishness of God is wiser than
men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
Last Wednesday
morning (along about 7:00) I read to my study group these
words from Peter Gomes:
The
reason that the dying sometimes ask to see the cross before
they die is to be reminded that Jesus has been where they
are now and that, by his grace, they are about to go where
he is. They know that death was as real to Jesus as it is
to them. They know that he was not rescued in the nick of
time. And they know that they will not be rescued in the
nick of time, either. They know that when his hour came,
he had to meet it .... that there was no way out .... and
that what was true for him will soon be true for them. But
they know that while there is no way out, there is a way
through.
Hold
thou the cross before my closing eyes,
Shine
through the gloom and point me to the skies,
Heaven's
morning breaks and earth's vain shadows flee,
In
life, in death, O Lord abide with me.
The other
night .... on the patio .... along about 10:30 .... fountain
splashing .... candles flickering .... stars shining ....
plates and glasses empty .... bellies full .... hearts as
one .... Kris said: "It really doesn't get much better
than this." And she was right, of course. For the time
being.
Note:
This sermon owes a tremendous debt to the creative suggestion
of Robert Farrar Capon and his new book, The Foolishness
of Preaching: Proclaiming the Gospel Against the Wisdom of
the World. The quote from Peter Gomes is taken from his
chapter on "The Bible and Suffering" which can be
found in The Good Book.
|