|
When this
service is done, I am going to not one, but two Super Bowl
parties. But I find myself in the incredibly strange position
of not caring who wins. I do have a slight wager riding on
the outcome. But it is with Hunter. It involves ice cream
(as most of our wagers do). So whether I win or lose, Hunter
and I are going to pig out. Which will bust our bellies. But
which won't break our banks.
My lack
of passion concerning the outcome is uncommon for me, given
that I believe football is not a game that should be played
simply for the fun of it. Meaning that outcomes are important.
Which is probably why I'll get into it by halftime, especially
if it's close. That's when I will decide I really do want
one team to win ... and will do my level best to root them
home.
It occurs
to me that one of the reasons I am less "into" pro
football has to do with the fact that it has been years ...
some might say "lifetimes" ... since our Lions won
anything that mattered. We have grown tired of losing. As,
apparently, has the Ford family. So they have cleaned house.
Pretty soon we will hear the new regime say things like: "This
team's gonna play hard every Sunday." Which, after 40
years, is not going to cut it for some of us. For what we
want the Lions to do every Sunday ... or at least most Sundays
... is win. Which raises the question: "Is that attitude
unchristian?"
Some years
ago, a friend bought me a book entitled Friday Night Lights.
It was the story of one town's obsession with its high school
football team. The town was Odessa, Texas.
The book
covers one entire season and, at times, paints a less than
flattering portrait. To be sure, there are plenty of stories
about quarterback sneaks, stacked defenses, pep rallies and
homecoming queens. But there are also stories about racism
and exploitation, about school boundaries being re-drawn to
recruit star tailbacks, about lowered academic expectations
for athletes, and about injections of illegal painkillers
administered behind the closed doors of the trainer's room.
The author,
who lived with the Odessa program, its players, coaches and
parents for an entire year, gives us a portrait that alternately
captivates us, angers us, indicts us and moves us to tears.
He tells us of the school's previous head coach who finally
gave up the pressure of coaching to become Regional Director
of Athletics. His name was John Wilkins and he was remembered
as a cold and aloof man, disliked by many who played for him.
Yet his record spoke for itself. Thirteen years. One hundred
forty-eight wins. Sixteen losses. Fifty-five shut outs. A
pair of state titles. Wilkins is quoted as saying that he
knew he wasn't close to his players and that he sometimes
rode them harder than he should. But he never believed that
the role of a coach was to build character or lasting relationships.
The role of a coach was to win. After all, this was high school
football and this was Odessa. He concluded: "You don't
keep your job on the basis of how many good guys you turn
out. In this community, you keep you job on the basis of how
many games you win."
But you
don't have to go to Texas to find a similar attitude. Until
recently, you could have gone to Traverse City, where (for
years) high school football was "king." People camped
out for days to buy season tickets, given that the stadium
wasn't able to accommodate everyone who wanted to come. The
Booster Club raised tens of thousands of dollars annually
to make sure that the program (and its players) never wanted
for anything. And while a swelling population base in Traverse
City mandated ... years ago ... the building of a second high
school, one of the largest pockets of resistance was the fear
that a second high school would dilute the football talent
pool at Traverse City Central.
Which,
when they finally built a second high school on the west side
of town, was exactly what happened. The talent pool was split
and Traverse City Central ceased to win like it was used to
winning. But before that happened, listen to the description
of an autumn Friday night in Traverse City.
The
high school girls are throwing adoring glances toward the
players. The parents are beaming. God is in his Grand Traverse
heaven. The Trojans are kicking the living bejesus out of
whoever lines up on the other side of the ball. And, for
the moment, it is perfectly permissible to drink it all
in and ask: Is there more to life than this?
Concerning
Traverse City football, a former player who now teaches in
the high school admitted:
It got
to be a disease. We were treated like stars. Some of the
breaks we got in the classroom were wrong. I don't know
that this is healthy. But I still remember how I went to
games as a kid and just wanted to "touch" a player.
And then I became one. To this day, I remember it all. Every
practice. Every play. Every block. Every tackle. Now, I
would hope that things are a little more in perspective.
One who
would say "Amen" to that is Rev. Laurie Haller.
Laurie is a Methodist preacher (full-time). And, thanks to
the sporting inclination of one of her daughters, a girls'
softball coach (part-time). Concerning her coaching career
... not her preaching career ... this is what she wrote:
From
the outset, I made it clear to my girls that our goal in
playing softball was not winning. Our goals were to learn
how to play, to work together as a team, and to have fun.
Toward that end, we had two basic rules. Rule number one:
Everybody bats. Every batting order included every girl,
regardless of her ability. And we varied the order from
game to game so each girl had a chance to bat first.
Rule
number two: Everybody plays every position. Our competitors
had their best girls playing the positions of greatest activity,
with weaker players being left to languish in the outfield.
Then Laurie
added this curious, albeit fascinating sentence:
Although
I am not all that vocal about it, I believe that this kind
of coaching best witnesses to the love of God. Just as God
welcomes into the Kingdom all kinds and abilities of people,
so I tried to give all of the girls an equal chance to play.
Now, there's
much to applaud in that. Especially when one adds Laurie's
third rule: "After every game, I give all of our girls
a hug, just to let them know that with God, every one of them
is a winner."
But I
also balance Laurie Haller's words against my own experience
in coaching. I was a Yale seminarian, coaching a basketball
team of fifth and sixth grade boys. We represented East Pearl
Street United Methodist Church in a league which featured
teams from all over inner-city New Haven. I, too, began with
the philosophy similar to Laurie Haller's. "We are here
to learn the game of basketball," I said. "We will
all play an equal amount of time. We will rotate every position.
No one kid will start every game. Etc." What happened,
of course, was that we were not competitive. We were regularly
getting our pride kicked ... along with everything else. Embarrassment
was diminishing the value of everything else we were learning.
The games were no fun. Interest in coming to practice waned.
Whatever value basketball may have had in keeping these kids
off the street (and in church) was fast being lost.
Finally,
some of the boys urged me to modify my philosophy. To be sure,
they wanted to "get in" every game. But they also
wanted me to play Andy and Steve, my two Italian Catholic
ringers, more minutes than the rest. They wanted me to start
Andy and Steve at the two most important positions, center
and point guard. They wanted to be on the floor with Andy
and Steve (not in place of them), thus ensuring that time
spent on the floor would hold the promise of stopping somebody
defensively and making an occasional basket offensively. In
short, they were discovering that being a team means sublimating
your own ego for the good of the team, fitting in where best
you can, and being supportive of others who may be more gifted
and talented than you. I realized that these were also good
lessons to be learned through basketball ... and good Christian
concepts to boot.
Ironically,
that shift in coaching philosophy made us more competitive.
We even won a game before the season was over. By being more
competitive, we showed respect for our opponents, in that
we were putting forth our best effort to win. What's more,
losing became far more tolerable (to the point where we could
actually learn something from it) because we were going all
out to win.
People
who know me tell me that I am a rather competitive human being.
I have debated that. But I am far from the best judge of my
nature. I am also told that clergy, as a group, tend to score
abnormally low on competitive instincts, when measured on
standard psychological tests. Perhaps I have simply masked
my competitive nature, the better to fit in with my peers.
I don't know. What I do know is that I tend to have a natural
resonance with people who are as comfortably competitive as
I am.
As a Christian,
I am not afraid of competition. Indeed, I welcome it. I think
we compete as a means of discovering and expressing the gifts
that God has given us. Some process of testing seems essential
to that discovery. That is what competition is all about.
It occurs, I think, on three levels.
- Some
of us test ourselves against an opponent. We compete against
another individual (or team). Sometimes we win. Sometimes
they win. Ideally, we try to compete at our own level, or
just a little it above. Mismatches are seldom fun, and almost
never teach us anything.
- Some
of us test ourselves against an image of perfection. We
compete against a standard. It could be a subjective standard
such as some judge's perception of a perfect ten. It could
be an absolute standard like a 300 game in bowling or a
par 72 in golf.
- Still
others of us test ourselves against our own prior effort.
We compete against our previous best. We strive to lower
our time, raise our count or improve our score.
Occasionally,
we compete on all three levels at the same time. Perhaps one
of the reasons that bowling is such a popular sport is that
one can bowl against an opponent ... against an absolute standard
... or against one's personal best. Three ways to win. Three
ways to pursue excellence. Three ways to maximize satisfaction.
Obviously,
there are pitfalls. Competition, like every sphere of human
activity, is subject to corruption. Competitors, too, fall
from grace. It happens all the time. What are the warning
signs? I'll give you ten.
- When
it isn't fun anymore (when the pressure obscures the pleasure).
- When
you aren't learning anything anymore.
- When
you find yourself bending, breaking or forgetting the rules.
- When
you view an opponent as someone to hurt or humiliate.
- When
your need to "shine" supersedes your team's need
for you to "sacrifice."
- When
money becomes the primary reason for going out there.
- When
somebody else's expectations become the primary reason for
going out there.
- When
perspective is lost, so that winning leads you to think
more highly of yourself than you ought to think, and losing,
less so.
- When
identity becomes confused with outcome, so that it takes
more and more victories to make you feel like a winner and
fewer and fewer defeats to make you feel like a loser.
- When
God is no longer honored by your effort.
Jesus,
to my knowledge, said absolutely nothing about competition.
Paul, who seemed fascinated by the subject, is quoted as saying:
"By all means, run to win the prize." But if you
read Paul carefully, one does so not because the prize is
important, but because the effort put forward to win it is
important.
I believe
a winning attitude matters. Filmmaker Woody Allen is fond
of saying that ninety percent of what life is about is simply
showing up. But I'm not sure that merely "appearing"
counts for all that much. The coaches of the Giants and the
Ravens have little doubt that, come 6:18 p.m., their teams
are going to "appear." What neither coach knows
... and won't know for the next two or three hours ... is
how badly their respective players "want it."
You have
all heard the old quatrain:
And
when the one Great Scorer
Comes to write your name,
It matters not who won or lost
But how you played the game.
To which
I hear the Apostle Paul adding: "As long as you play
it to win."
*
* * * *
As I said
moments ago, I do not particularly care ... at least this
year ... who wins the Super Bowl. Nor does God. But for the
sake of those of us who are looking for a good game, I sure
hope the Giants and the Ravens do.
*
* * * *
By the
way, Hunter is picking the Giants. But he is not giving points.
That's because Hunter, for all of his seven years, is both
a lover of good ice cream and a tough Christian competitor.
|